2023
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msad085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 Mutational Spectrum

Abstract: SARS-CoV-2 evolves rapidly in part because of its high mutation rate. Here we examine whether this mutational process itself has changed during viral evolution. To do this, we quantify the relative rates of different types of single nucleotide mutations at four-fold degenerate sites in the viral genome across millions of human SARS-CoV-2 sequences. We find clear shifts in the relative rates of several types of mutations during SARS-CoV-2 evolution. The most striking trend is a roughly two-fold decrease in the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
4
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PHATE visualization of the 296,437 retained de novo iSNVs by genomic position display no clustering according to the mutational pattern, underscoring the optimal curation of the dataset (Figure 6A). Additionally, the substitution spectrum of this curated set shows a prevalence of C > T and G > T substitutions (Figure 6B), aligning with consensus iSNV patterns and known SARS-CoV-2 mutational trends (Moshiri et al 2023; Fumagalli et al 2023; Bloom et al 2023; Saldivar-Espinoza et al 2023).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The PHATE visualization of the 296,437 retained de novo iSNVs by genomic position display no clustering according to the mutational pattern, underscoring the optimal curation of the dataset (Figure 6A). Additionally, the substitution spectrum of this curated set shows a prevalence of C > T and G > T substitutions (Figure 6B), aligning with consensus iSNV patterns and known SARS-CoV-2 mutational trends (Moshiri et al 2023; Fumagalli et al 2023; Bloom et al 2023; Saldivar-Espinoza et al 2023).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Nevertheless, these mutations may be the prelude for further mutations in the course of the evolution of the new sub-lineage. Therefore, monitoring the periodical changes in the virus dynamics is important [37]. Through the combination of high-throughput sequencing technologies with phylogenetic analysis, it is possible to assess parallel patterns of evolution driving significant phenotypic shifts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While C29095T is a mutation towards the most closely related viruses sampled in bats, the A + C29095T haplotype is rejected as the root of the SARS-CoV-2 phylogenetic tree in humans by Pekar et al (2022). Methods in Bloom (2021b) neglect that C→T mutations are by far the most frequent type of mutation during the pandemic (Azgari et al, 2021;De Maio et al, 2021;Bloom et al, 2023;Ruis et al, 2023), and that the C29095T mutation, specifically, occurs much more frequently than expected for a typical C→T mutation (Bloom and Neher, 2023, supplementary data nt_fitness.csv). This mutation regularly reappeared in multiple lineages during the last four years of SARS-CoV-2 evolution in humans (Figure S3).…”
Section: No Evidence Of a Widespread Undetected Circulation Of Virus ...mentioning
confidence: 99%