2021
DOI: 10.1038/s43017-020-00116-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of the structure and impact of Earth’s biosphere

Abstract: We provide a new perspective on how the structure of Earth's biosphere and its capacity to alter geochemical cycles have changed over its >3.5 billion-year history. We review evidence that oxygenic photosynthesis evolved relatively early in Earth's history, but contend that marine primary productivity was low, surface oxygen was scarce, and marine anoxia was prevalent for the majority of Earth's history. Anoxygenic phototrophs were likely a key part of the marine biosphere in these low-oxygen oceans, and nutri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 192 publications
(264 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also commonly thought that ~10 −7 PAL P O 2 is a point of atmospheric instability, either resulting in a return to a more reduced state or the oxygenation of the atmosphere [i.e., ( 52 )]. It is much more likely that O 2 was produced locally in soils and shallow seas by microbial communities and rapidly consumed locally by reduced materials before entering the greater atmosphere [e.g., ( 39 , 53 , 54 )]. In such a scenario, our equivalent P O 2 estimates are still valid as lower limits for the P O 2 experienced by some soils but likely do not reflect the atmosphere in the way that P O 2 inferred from MIF-S does.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also commonly thought that ~10 −7 PAL P O 2 is a point of atmospheric instability, either resulting in a return to a more reduced state or the oxygenation of the atmosphere [i.e., ( 52 )]. It is much more likely that O 2 was produced locally in soils and shallow seas by microbial communities and rapidly consumed locally by reduced materials before entering the greater atmosphere [e.g., ( 39 , 53 , 54 )]. In such a scenario, our equivalent P O 2 estimates are still valid as lower limits for the P O 2 experienced by some soils but likely do not reflect the atmosphere in the way that P O 2 inferred from MIF-S does.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the CO 2 level and CH 4 flux assumed here are correct for the mid-Proterozoic, few constraints can be placed on pO 2 from the existing O-MIF data. Terrestrial GPP values of 4,000 Tmol Á yr À1 or higher (26) can be ruled out, though, because they produce Δ 017 O values in O 2 less negative than À6& (SI Appendix, Fig. S6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not the case. Discussing the early geochemical record of photosynthesis is outside the scope of this paper, and my expertise, but I do wish to highlight a recent review by Planavsky et al (2021) that illustrates how biological perspectives, in not small amount, contribute to shaping thinking on the topic when approached from an Earth Sciences perspective. The authors wrote:…”
Section: A New Revision: Simple But Radicalmentioning
confidence: 99%