2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of trust networks in social web applications using supervised learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One is to use supervised learning. The selected training data is related to time series [Huang et al 2005;Imana et al 2010;Zolfaghar and Aghaie 2011;Yuan et al 2006]. The other is to use reinforcement learning, which itself continually optimizes strategies based on real-time feedback from performing operations [Kim and Song 2011;Tran 2015, 2017].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is to use supervised learning. The selected training data is related to time series [Huang et al 2005;Imana et al 2010;Zolfaghar and Aghaie 2011;Yuan et al 2006]. The other is to use reinforcement learning, which itself continually optimizes strategies based on real-time feedback from performing operations [Kim and Song 2011;Tran 2015, 2017].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zolfaghar and Aghaie [72] developed a supervised timeaware trust prediction approach. They considered the trust prediction problem as a temporal link prediction problem.…”
Section: ) Supervised Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervised/Unsupervised Context-Aware Dynamic Moradi and Ahmadian [88] U N Y Sanadhy and Singh [89] U N Y Raj and Babu [73] U N N Zhao et al [74] S Y N Zhang et al [93] U Y Y Zhang et al [107] S Y N Zhang et al [75] S N N Zhang et al [108] S Y N Liu et al [109] U Y N Zheng et al [112] U Y N Matsutani et al [94] U N N Tang et al [95] U N Y Zhang and Yu [47] U N N Chakraverty et al [76] S N N Sacco and Breslin [56] S N N Huang et al [96] U N N Li and Wang [117] U Y N Fazeli et al [90] U N N Tang et al [92] U N N Moturu and Liu [97] U N N Nunez-Gonzalez et al [77] S N N Yao et al [98] U N N Huang et al [99] U N N Liu et al [37] S N Y Ma et alL [60] S N N Matsuo and Yamamoto [61] S N Y Grana et al [62] S N N Wang et al [63] S N N Bachi et al [66] S Y N Korovaiko and Thomo [68] S N N Borzymek and Sydow [69] S N N Laspez and Maag [70] S Y N Ghafari et al [65] S Y N Zolfaghar and Aghaie [72] S Y Y Tang et al [25] U N N Wang et al [82] U N N Ghafari et al [58] and [4] U Y N Guha et al [84] U N N Golbeck [85] U N N Wang et al [32] U N N Zheng et al …”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors adopted the Rigg's algorithm to compute quality of service content and the user's trust degree of providing content because the clarity trust rank for credible websites is not always useful and is typically sparse. Zolfaghar and Abdollah (2011) proposed evolution of trust networks in social web applications using supervised learning. In order to predict the probability of trust relationship, the paper maps the current issue on formal link prediction problem and solves it with supervised learning.…”
Section: Relate Workmentioning
confidence: 99%