2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.medin.2015.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution over a 15-year period of the clinical characteristics and outcomes of critically ill patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
17
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This potential overestimation could also explain the high rate of P. aeruginosa co-infection observed in that study (14.1%): in another recent study in patients with influenza-related infection, the authors found a 1.3% rate of P. aeruginosa co-infection in patients with CAP and 8.3% in patients with healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) [9]. The high incidence found in the present study cannot be explained by a local (national) feature, since same authors reported lower rates of P. aeruginosa CAP and HCAP in Spain during this same time [10,11]. Either false positives (patients diagnosed as pneumonia whereas only colonized) or a specific, not yet described, influenza-P. aeruginosa co-infection (Shah at al., found similar incidence of P. aeruginosa [12]) could explain such high rates of P. aeruginosa pneumonia, especially if they truly are community acquired.…”
supporting
confidence: 49%
“…This potential overestimation could also explain the high rate of P. aeruginosa co-infection observed in that study (14.1%): in another recent study in patients with influenza-related infection, the authors found a 1.3% rate of P. aeruginosa co-infection in patients with CAP and 8.3% in patients with healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) [9]. The high incidence found in the present study cannot be explained by a local (national) feature, since same authors reported lower rates of P. aeruginosa CAP and HCAP in Spain during this same time [10,11]. Either false positives (patients diagnosed as pneumonia whereas only colonized) or a specific, not yet described, influenza-P. aeruginosa co-infection (Shah at al., found similar incidence of P. aeruginosa [12]) could explain such high rates of P. aeruginosa pneumonia, especially if they truly are community acquired.…”
supporting
confidence: 49%
“…Coverslips were then washed 3 times with PBS and fixed for 15 min at RT with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS. Coverslips were then washed once with PBS and aldehydes were quenched by addition of 50 mM NH 4 Cl in PBS for 30 min at 4°C. For double immunofluorescence, coverslips were blocked using 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS (blocking buffer) for 1 h at RT and incubated for 1 h at RT with rabbit anti-serotype 4 (Statens Serum Institut; 1:1,000 in blocking buffer).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 20–50% of healthy children and 8–30% of healthy adults are asymptomatically colonized ( McCullers, 2006 ). Pneumococci cause diseases ranging from mild, i.e., sinusitis, conjunctivitis, and otitis media, to more severe and potentially life-threatening infections, including community-acquired pneumonia, bacteraemia, and meningitis ( Bogaert et al, 2004 ; Valles et al, 2016 ). This bacterium is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates in risk groups such as immunocompromised individuals, children, and elderly ( Black et al, 2010 ; Valles et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Gram-positive Bacteria Associated With Respiratory Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%