2019
DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.19.10706-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EVOLUTION Study: 12-month results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample size was calculated according to the hypothesis that DES would perform at least 50% better than BMS regarding restenosis as shown in earlier studies, 34,44,45 In an optimal setting with low-risk patients the rate of restenosis in DES treatment of FP lesions can be as low as 14-17% at 1 year. [45][46][47] The rate of restenosis at 12 months in a cohort with only CLTI and long lesions are higher, reaching at least 35% in earlier studies of BMS treatment 34 and 23% in earlier DES studies on long FP lesions. 46 The sample size in this study to perform 50% better than a restenosis rate of 30-40%, thus reached 100 subjects in each group, with a power of 85% and an alfa-level of .05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sample size was calculated according to the hypothesis that DES would perform at least 50% better than BMS regarding restenosis as shown in earlier studies, 34,44,45 In an optimal setting with low-risk patients the rate of restenosis in DES treatment of FP lesions can be as low as 14-17% at 1 year. [45][46][47] The rate of restenosis at 12 months in a cohort with only CLTI and long lesions are higher, reaching at least 35% in earlier studies of BMS treatment 34 and 23% in earlier DES studies on long FP lesions. 46 The sample size in this study to perform 50% better than a restenosis rate of 30-40%, thus reached 100 subjects in each group, with a power of 85% and an alfa-level of .05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[45][46][47] The rate of restenosis at 12 months in a cohort with only CLTI and long lesions are higher, reaching at least 35% in earlier studies of BMS treatment 34 and 23% in earlier DES studies on long FP lesions. 46 The sample size in this study to perform 50% better than a restenosis rate of 30-40%, thus reached 100 subjects in each group, with a power of 85% and an alfa-level of .05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Unfavorable impact of lesion length on patency was already noted in earlier studies on laser-cut nitinol stents and polymer-free DES. 13,[27][28][29] It is argued whether stent fractures should be considered as possible cause. 30 No direct comparison between laser-cut and interwoven stents for long lesions is provided until now; however, subgroup analysis from the SUPERA 500 registry suggests that with interwoven nitinol stents, lesion length has less unfavorable impact on patency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Efficacy of the Self-Expanding iVolution® n itinol s tent f or treatment of femoropopliteal lesions (EVOLUTION) study reported that iVolution® self-expanding nitinol stent (iVascular, S.L.U., Barcelona, Spain) had showed 86.3% primary patency rate and 88.0% freedom from revascularization at 12 months and 76.7% and 77.2% at 24 months, respectively. [ 25 , 26 ] However, Deloose[ 27 , 28 ] reported that, in the Clinical Trial Investigating the Combination Therapy With Luminor® D CB a nd iVolution Stent in TASC C and D Femoropopliteal Lesions (TINTIN), a primary patency of 96.5% and freedom from revascularization rate of 98.9% at six months and these figures were 90.5% and 94.4% at 12 months, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%