Evolution Via Epr-Entanglement Algorithm

Cooper, W. Grant

doi:10.14738/jbemi.42.2795

Cited by 4 publications

(291 citation statements)

References 122 publications

(672 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

274

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Under these conditions, interactions between superpositions of entangled states [7][8][9][10][11] and water, ions and/or random temperature fluctuations [12] would cause rapid decoherence [13,14], which would disallow quantum contributions to normally observed biological reactions. Nevertheless, operational molecular genetic systems exist [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] that routinely exhibit "normal" molecular genetic reactions which are incompatible with classical Watson-Crick [27,28], but are internally consistent with EPRgenerated [29][30][31][32][33][34] entangled proton qubits [35][36][37][38][39], subjected to measurements by Grover's-type [40] quantum processors [41][42][43][44][45]. Dynamic quantum information processing [15][16][17] examples exhibited by ancient [46] T4 phage DNA [47]…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nevertheless, operational molecular genetic systems exist [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] that routinely exhibit "normal" molecular genetic reactions which are incompatible with classical Watson-Crick [27,28], but are internally consistent with EPRgenerated [29][30][31][32][33][34] entangled proton qubits [35][36][37][38][39], subjected to measurements by Grover's-type [40] quantum processors [41][42][43][44][45]. Dynamic quantum information processing [15][16][17] examples exhibited by ancient [46] T4 phage DNA [47][48][49][50][51] are also exhibited by (i) evolving rat -human microsatellite (short tandem repeats, STRs) distributions [38,52], (ii) inherited Huntington's disease [37,53,54] (CAG)n (n ≥ 36) repeats, and (iii) manifestation of distinguishable, entanglementenabl...…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Based on the present and previousassessments [35][36][37][38][39], quantum information processing [40][41][42][43][44][45] exhibited by prokaryotic [15][16][17]20,21] and eukaryotic [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] genomic systems can be evolutionarily explained in terms of EPR-generated [29][30][31] entangled proton qubits originating in primordial RNA -ribozyme duplex segments [35,36,[57][58][59][60][61][62][63], which subsequently were quantum mechanically processed by Grover's-type [40] quantum readers. The molecular genetics history of observing [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], but misidentifying, time-dependent EPR-generated [29][30]…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The molecular genetics history of observing [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], but misidentifying, time-dependent EPR-generated [29][30][31]-keto-amino -(entanglement) → enol-imine -entangled proton qubits ( Figure 1-4) has enabled perpetration of a falsifiable molecular genetics model, i.e., the classical molecular clock [15][16][17]27,28]. In these cases [18][19][20][21][22][35][36][37][38][39][49][50][51]54], random classical processes [12] subjected metabolically inert [64], metastable hydrogen bonded amino (−NH2) DNA proton systems [65] to quantum uncertainty limits [2,66], Δx Δpx ≥ ħ/2. This introduced a probability of direct quantum mechanical proton -proton interaction, yielding EPRarrangements [29][30][31], keto-amino -(entanglement) → enol−imine, observed [15][16][17] as G-C → G´-C´, G-C → *G-*C and A-T → *A-*T. (G´-C´, *G-*C,*A-*T-denote necessity of Hilbert space to describe dynamics of embedded entangled proton qubits; see Figure 2…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Figure 1: Schematic of "metastable" keto-amino and "ground state" enol-imine hydrogen bonds. (Amino protons encounter quantum uncertainty limits [2], ΔxΔpx ≥ ħ/2, introducing probabilities of EPR [29][30][31][35][36][37][38][39] arrangements, keto-amino -(entanglement)→ enol−imine. The asymmetric double-well potential represents an energy surface "seen by" a metastable hydrogen bonding amino proton, and a "ground state", entangled enol or imine proton.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

EPR-Proton Qubits’ Role in Evolution and Age-Related Disease

W¹

2017

PSBJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Earth's surface acquired necessary life-giving volatile elements carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur from a collision with a Mercury-like planetary embryo ~ 4.4 billion y ago. Icy comets containing hydrocarbons collided with a cooling prebiotic Earth to create impact reactive environments that via classical anthropic causality introduced primordial "ribozyme-like" RNA complexes which could duplicate a few molecular units/24 hrs. Random classical processes introduced energetically accessible duplex RNA segments containing keto─amino (─NH2) hydrogen bonds, where hydrogen bonded amino protons encountered quantum uncertainty limits, Δx Δpx ≥ ħ/2. This introduced probabilities of EPR-arrangements, ketoamino-(entanglement) → enol−imine, where reduced energy product protons are each shared between two different indistinguishable sets of electron lone-pairs belonging to enol oxygen and imine nitrogen on opposite genome strands. Product protons participate in entangled quantum oscillations at ~4×10 13 s −1 (~ 4800m s −1) between near symmetric energy wells in decoherence-free subspaces until measured, δt << 10 −13 s, in a genome groove, ~12 or 22Å, by selected Grover's quantum bio-processors. Analyses imply entanglement origins of the triplet code, 4 3 codons, specifying ~ 22 L-amino acids. Entanglement resources provided a sequence of ~ 12 incremental entanglement-enabled improvements to genome fitness, of the form: RNA-ribozyme → genetic code origin → RNA-protein → DNA-protein. An EPR-entanglement algorithm explains "probabilistic" genomic growth over the past ~ 3.610 9 y from duplex RNA-ribozyme segments, into a DNA double helix of ~ 6.810 9 bp. Entangled proton "qubit pairs" are the smallest "measurable" genetic informational unit, specifying evolution instructions with "measured" quantum information. This EPR-entanglement model accurately predicts microsatellite evolutionary distributions in rat and human genomes. Consistent with preserving "wild-type" gene pool viability, Huntington's and other age-related human diseases are phenotypically expressed by Grover's quantum processors, measuring quantum informational content of entangled proton qubits occupying a "threshold limit".

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

EPR-Proton Qubits’ Role in Evolution and Age-Related Disease

W¹

2017

PSBJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Consequences of EPR–Proton Qubits Populating DNA

Cooper

2018

Advances in Quantum Chemistry

264

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Entanglement-Enabled Information Processing Implies Human Consciousness Mechanism

W¹

2018

PSBJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Quantum information processing of EPR-generated entangled proton qubits exhibited by rat and human genomes falsifies the in vivo anti-entanglement hypothesis. An EPR-entangled proton qubit algorithm explains "probabilistic" genomic growth-over the past ~ 3.6x10 9 y-from primordial duplex RNA-ribozyme segments, into a DNA double helix of ~ 6.8x10 9 bp. Homo sapiens' consciousness is thus considered a consequence of ~3.6x10 9 y of entanglement-enabled evolution. The evolved human brain acquired sensory "biological files" for vision, acoustics, vocal, olfactory, touch, taste, balance, self-motion, pain, emotion, language, analytical, music, imagination, "truth" and "fantasy". Sensory files are interfaced with, initially vacant, "hard drive" memory files that acquire input data from one or all sensory files. Each "new" experience (stimulus) generates input for "hard drive" memory. This stimulus creates an entanglement state between the "measured", entangled groove-proton "qubit-pair" and Grover's enzyme quantum processor , which executes quantum information processing , Δt́ ≤ 10-14 s, before proton decoherence, τD < 10-13 s. The sequence of acquired input events, e.g., successfully riding a bicycle, is "permanently" stored. When EPR-generated entangled proton qubit-pairs populate DNA sequences not evolutionarily selected for normal quantum information processing in neurological cells, heritable neurological diseases-e.g., Huntington's disease and congenital myotonic dystrophy-are exhibited, thereby protecting the gene pool against evolutionary extinction. Anesthetics inhibit Grover's quantum-reader enzyme from quantifying quantum informational content within EPR-generated entangled proton qubits. This absence of quantum information processing instructions disallows normal consciousness, yielding unconsciousness. Significance of entanglement is illustrated by age-related cancer data (ages 10 to 80 y). "Accurate" evaluation by a "corrected" Muller's constant "mutational load" expression, i.e., dN/dt = λ + βt-where βt (β ≈ 2.2x10-23 s-2) is an EPR-entanglement termyields assessments that clearly identify EPR-entanglement terms, Σjβj t 4 , as solely responsible for age-related cancer manifestation, but classical contributions-Σi λi t 3 , "passenger mutations"-do not contribute to disease. Conceptual Paper Volume 2 Issue 1

show abstract

Evolution Via Epr-Entanglement Algorithm

Cited by 4 publications

References 122 publications

EPR-Proton Qubits’ Role in Evolution and Age-Related Disease

EPR-Proton Qubits’ Role in Evolution and Age-Related Disease

Consequences of EPR–Proton Qubits Populating DNA

Entanglement-Enabled Information Processing Implies Human Consciousness Mechanism

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About