1998
DOI: 10.1023/a:1006554906681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
2,661
0
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,601 publications
(2,696 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
28
2,661
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…A strategy s * is called a singular strategy (Geritz et al, 1997(Geritz et al, , 1998 if the selection gradient vanishes when that strategy is resident, D 1 (s * ) = 0.…”
Section: First-order Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A strategy s * is called a singular strategy (Geritz et al, 1997(Geritz et al, , 1998 if the selection gradient vanishes when that strategy is resident, D 1 (s * ) = 0.…”
Section: First-order Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolutionary branching is a process in which the trait of an evolving monomorphic population first approaches a so-called singular trait, but then disruptive selection causes the population to become dimorphic, i.e., to contain two different resident traits, and these two traits evolve away from each other (Metz et al, 1992(Metz et al, , 1996Geritz et al, 1997Geritz et al, , 1998. When mutations are so frequent that there is no clear separation between ecological and evolutionary timescales, evolutionary branching means that a unimodal trait distribution first concentrates around the singular strategy, and then the distribution becomes bimodal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General AD literature (see e.g., Champagnat et al., 2001; Dieckmann & Law, 1996; Geritz et al., 1998) follows the evolution of a quantitative phenotypic trait or set of traits, s , that can change through mutations. In these studies, the probability μ at which mutations appear is considered a possible function of the trait s , but afterwards and further on in the AD literature is usually left as a constant of each model.…”
Section: Adaptive Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this minimal landscape approximation is able to capture the dynamical behaviour of our gene‐related landscape model, mainly with an initial exponential growth followed by saturation around the peak, which can be proven to be an evolutionary stable strategy (Geritz et al., 1998). …”
Section: Evolution Of Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to better understand the phenomenon of consumer-resource coevolution and its effects on intervality, the evolution of food webs could be studied using, for example, techniques of adaptive dynamics (Dieckmann and Law, 1996;Geritz et al, 1998). In the adaptive dynamics framework, invasion fitness is derived from the underlying model, removing the need for an externally imposed fitness measure or ad hoc assumptions such as that of focused consumers.…”
Section: Food-web Intervality With Weakly Focused Consumersmentioning
confidence: 99%