2012
DOI: 10.1002/mmng.201200002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary and ecological patterns in body size, shape, and ornamentation in the Jurassic bivalve Chlamys (Chlamys) textoria (Schlotheim, 1820)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar case was noted for the pectinid Chlamys textoria with a size increase persisting through until Pliensbachian stage (Nürnberg et al . ). During the same interval that Plagiostoma giganteum increases in size ( planorbis to bucklandi zones) there is a marked increase in the size of ammonites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A similar case was noted for the pectinid Chlamys textoria with a size increase persisting through until Pliensbachian stage (Nürnberg et al . ). During the same interval that Plagiostoma giganteum increases in size ( planorbis to bucklandi zones) there is a marked increase in the size of ammonites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Depending on the physiological mechanisms involved and the possible causes, a body size decrease could be recognized at different biological scales of organization (Daufresne et al, 2009;Ohlberger, 2013). Therefore, a body size decrease at the community level can reflect changes in the taxonomic composition of the assemblages at the population level (i.e.…”
Section: A Belemnite Size Decrease During the Toarcian?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the evolutionary and ecological importance of the Lilliput effect remains poorly understood. Furthermore, because of physiological differences, not all organisms necessarily exhibit a body size reduction in the face of warming or other environmental stresses (Gardner et al, 2011;Ohlberger, 2013). Some authors even consider that, in some cases, the body size reduction might reflect a preservation or collection artefact (McGowan et al, 2009;Brayard et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, recognition of shape can contribute to detectability independently of an object's colour (Ings et al, 2012, Brown et al, 1992, Carlile et al, 2006, Schluessel et al, 2012, Lehrer and Campan, 2004, with shape properties relied on for recognition when colour polymorphism occurs (Tanaka and Presnell, 1999). Therefore, an animal's shape influences its ability to conceal itself and may have evolved characteristics to minimise its detection (Nuernberg et al, 2012, Smith, 2003.…”
Section: Animal Shape and Concealmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in visual environments with low complexity (Merilaita, 2003)), shape might provide additional concealment. There is some limited evidence that shape has evolved as an adaptation for concealment (Nuernberg et al, 2012, Smith, 2003.…”
Section: Animal Shape and Concealmentmentioning
confidence: 99%