2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-97982-3_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Constraint in Artificial Gene Regulatory Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher number of peripheral nodes compared to intermediate and hub nodes in both treatments involving heat stress suggests that, while the general stress response may be conserved, multiple components of the network may be activated in response to different external stressors (McClintock 1984). This perhaps reflects a trade-off between evolutionary robustness constraint and stressor-specific gene expression, an architectural requirement of evolvable systems (Kitano 2004) and a trait also seen in computational simulations of evolved artificial gene regulatory networks (Turner et al 2019; Turner and Wollenberg Valero 2021)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The higher number of peripheral nodes compared to intermediate and hub nodes in both treatments involving heat stress suggests that, while the general stress response may be conserved, multiple components of the network may be activated in response to different external stressors (McClintock 1984). This perhaps reflects a trade-off between evolutionary robustness constraint and stressor-specific gene expression, an architectural requirement of evolvable systems (Kitano 2004) and a trait also seen in computational simulations of evolved artificial gene regulatory networks (Turner et al 2019; Turner and Wollenberg Valero 2021)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The higher number of peripheral nodes compared to intermediate and hub nodes in both treatments involving heat stress suggests that, while the general stress response may be conserved, multiple components of the network may be activated in response to different external stressors (McClintock 1984). This perhaps reflects a trade-off between evolutionary robustness constraint and stressor-specific gene expression, an architectural requirement of evolvable systems (Kitano 2004) and a trait also seen in computational simulations of evolved artificial gene regulatory networks (Turner et al 2019;Turner and Wollenberg Valero 2021) The intermediate position of nodes responding to UV indicates that the innate response to UV is regulated via nodes that affect many other gene products through having the highest neighborhood connectivity (Wollenberg Valero 2020), which may cause activation of multiple genes in a pathway, potentially leading to survival consequences (Jeong et al 2001;Bonatto 2007). It needs to be explored further whether the differentially expressed genes are related to repair or damage processes, or both (Zagarese and Williamson 2001;Dong et al 2007;Chen et al 2020;Feugere et al, n.d.).…”
Section: Stress Response Genes Are Located Centrally In the Zebrafish...mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The artificial gene regulatory network (AGRN) is a computational model which takes inspiration form gene regulation in nature. The AGRN is a connectionist architecture specifically designed for computational problem solving [11]. The AGRN is comprised of a set of individual genes which are connected to one another in a typically non-symmetrical topology.…”
Section: Artificial Gene Regulatory Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AGRN's are typically deterministic in nature, but in this work we inject a stochastic element which allows only some of the network to be functional at any given time. This will introduce an element of constraint, which has been shown to affect robustness and adaptability in computer models [11] as well as in biological networks [15]. We can then compare this to a deterministic AGRN by optimising them using a genetic algorithm to solve two key tasks, the coupled inverted pendulums task and the rocket lander task [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%