2012
DOI: 10.1242/dev.078204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary crossroads in developmental biology: the spiderParasteatoda tepidariorum

Abstract: SummarySpiders belong to the chelicerates, which is an arthropod group that branches basally from myriapods, crustaceans and insects. Spiders are thus useful models with which to investigate whether aspects of development are ancestral or derived with respect to the arthropod common ancestor. Moreover, they serve as an important reference point for comparison with the development of other metazoans. Therefore, studies of spider development have made a major contribution to advancing our understanding of the ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
101
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, using the example of a specimen presented extensively in this paper, a 4 th instar that undergoes apolysis, considered as a whole, remains a 4 th instar throughout proecdysis, and the pharate 5 th instar constitutes only a part (albeit the predominant part) of this proecdysial 4 th instar. As proposed by Downes (1987), and adopted by others (e.g., Townley and Tillinghast 2009, Wolff and Hilbrant 2011, Hilbrant et al 2012, Mittmann and Wolff 2012, when an embryo hatches, the postembryo is released, and ecdysis in the postembryo, including the discarding of its exuvium (shed exoskeleton), produces the 1 st instar and marks the start of the 1 st stadium. The molt between the postembryonic stage and 1 st stadium is taken to be the 1 st molt (Downes 1987).…”
Section: Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, using the example of a specimen presented extensively in this paper, a 4 th instar that undergoes apolysis, considered as a whole, remains a 4 th instar throughout proecdysis, and the pharate 5 th instar constitutes only a part (albeit the predominant part) of this proecdysial 4 th instar. As proposed by Downes (1987), and adopted by others (e.g., Townley and Tillinghast 2009, Wolff and Hilbrant 2011, Hilbrant et al 2012, Mittmann and Wolff 2012, when an embryo hatches, the postembryo is released, and ecdysis in the postembryo, including the discarding of its exuvium (shed exoskeleton), produces the 1 st instar and marks the start of the 1 st stadium. The molt between the postembryonic stage and 1 st stadium is taken to be the 1 st molt (Downes 1987).…”
Section: Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, two Entelegynae, the central American wandering spider Cupiennius salei and the common house spider Parasteatoda tepidariorum (formerly Achaearanea tepidariorum ; chelicerate, arthropod, and metazoan evolution and development (McGregor et al 2008a ;Hilbrant et al 2012 ). More recently, the Haplogynae Pholcus phalangioides has been employed as a satellite model to provide a comparative perspective in spider EvoDevo within Araneomorphae (Pechmann et al 2011 ), and there has also been one comparative gene expression study in a mygalomorph (Pechmann and Prpic 2009 ).…”
Section: Araneae (Spiders)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Migrating cumuli have also been noted in Amblypygi (Weygoldt 1975 ), Opiliones (Holm 1947 ;Juberthie 1964 ), possibly in a solifuge (Heymons 1904 ;Holm 1947 ) and most recently in a tick (Santos et al 2013b ). The cumulus has therefore been suggested as belonging to the ground pattern in Chelicerata (Hilbrant et al 2012 ). However, the tick cumulus seems not to express Dpp, but instead, it appears to receive Dpp (Santos et al 2013a , b ).…”
Section: Germ Rudiment Formation and Axis Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This success has been facilitated by detailed descriptions of its early embryogenesis (Akiyama- Oda and Oda, 2003;Mittmann and Wolff, 2012), the establishment of tools to study gene expression and gene function (Akiyama- Oda and Oda, 2006;McGregor et al, 2008a;Kanayama et al, 2010;Kanayama et al, 2011;Hilbrant et al, 2012), as well as the availability of embryonic transcriptomic resources (Posnien et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%