1985
DOI: 10.1145/1012483.1012490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Delivery versus the "waterfall model"

Abstract: The conventional wisdom of planning software engineering projects, using the widely cited "waterfall model" is not the only useful software development process model. In fact, the "waterfall model" may be unrealistic, and dangerous to the primary objectives of any software project.The alternative model, which I choose to call "evolutionary delivery" is not widely taught or practiced yet. But there is already more than a decade of practical experience in using it. In various forms. It is quite clear from these … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0
6

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
11
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Gilb based EVO on three simple principles [17]: • Deliver something to the real end-user • Measure the added-value to the user in all critical dimensions • Adjust both design and objectives based on observed realities…”
Section: Reusing Ideas From Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Gilb based EVO on three simple principles [17]: • Deliver something to the real end-user • Measure the added-value to the user in all critical dimensions • Adjust both design and objectives based on observed realities…”
Section: Reusing Ideas From Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When he discussed the early frequent iteration, he emphasised the concept of selecting the "potential steps with the highest user-value to developmentcost ratio for earliest implementation" [17]. Another important concept in EVO method is "Complete analysis, design and test in each step" where he stated that the waterfall is one of the great time wasters with too many unknowns, too much dynamic change and systems complexity.…”
Section: Reusing Ideas From Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations