2017
DOI: 10.1101/111377
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary dynamics of male reproductive genes in theDrosophila virilissubgroup

Abstract: Postcopulatory sexual selection (PCSS) is a potent evolutionary force that can drive rapid changes of reproductive genes within species, and thus has the potential to generate reproductive incompatibilities between species. Male seminal fluid proteins (SFPs) are major players in postmating interactions, and likely the main targets of PCSS in males. The virilis subgroup of Drosophila exhibits strong interspecific gametic incompatibilities, and can serve as a model to study the genetic basis of PCSS and gametic … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, D e is significantly lower for G expr compared to S expr genes (Figure a; Wilcoxon rank‐sum test p < 10 −6 ), indicating that stronger purifying selection at the haploid stage of the life cycle prevents expression divergence between species for most genes. In animals, the genes with functions related to male gametogenesis, such as accessory gland proteins in Drosophila, are often reported to show faster evolutionary rates, possibly due to positive selection fuelled by sexual conflict (e.g., Ahmed‐Braimah, Unckless, & Clark, ). The S. latifolia and S. dioica genes that are overexpressed in pollen (P expr ; the category includes genes with at least fivefold higher expression in pollen compared to male somatic tissues) also show accelerated expression divergence, compared to non‐overexpressed genes; in particular, the distribution of D e for P expr genes is significantly shifted upwards compared to G expr and S expr genes (Figure a; Wilcoxon rank‐sum test p < 10 −6 for both P expr :G expr and P expr :S expr comparisons).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, D e is significantly lower for G expr compared to S expr genes (Figure a; Wilcoxon rank‐sum test p < 10 −6 ), indicating that stronger purifying selection at the haploid stage of the life cycle prevents expression divergence between species for most genes. In animals, the genes with functions related to male gametogenesis, such as accessory gland proteins in Drosophila, are often reported to show faster evolutionary rates, possibly due to positive selection fuelled by sexual conflict (e.g., Ahmed‐Braimah, Unckless, & Clark, ). The S. latifolia and S. dioica genes that are overexpressed in pollen (P expr ; the category includes genes with at least fivefold higher expression in pollen compared to male somatic tissues) also show accelerated expression divergence, compared to non‐overexpressed genes; in particular, the distribution of D e for P expr genes is significantly shifted upwards compared to G expr and S expr genes (Figure a; Wilcoxon rank‐sum test p < 10 −6 for both P expr :G expr and P expr :S expr comparisons).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() found no relationship between genetic distance and the strength of PMPZ isolation, suggesting divergence is not simply a result of isolation by distance. Instead, PMPZ isolation likely emerges as a by‐product of both sexual selection and sexual conflict which are important in shaping the rapid co‐evolution of ejaculate‐female reproductive tract interactions (Ahmed‐Braimah et al., ; Bono et al., ; Mendelson, Martin, & Flaxman, ; Pitnick et al., ). Given that D. montana males transfer and females store motile sperm for fertilization but (most of) these sperm do not penetrate eggs, incompatibility is likely because of mismatches between sperm and egg release.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing body of literature now shows PMPZ isolation is the primary or only barrier to gene flow in some closely related taxa, suggesting an important role in the early evolution of reproductive isolation (Ahmed‐Braimah, Unckless, & Clark, ; Bono, Matzkin, Hoang, & Brandsmeier, ; Cramer et al., ; Dean & Nachman, ; Soudi, Reinhold, & Engqvist, ; Turissini et al., ). However, the majority of research has focused on incompatibilities arising between species even though barriers that maintain reproductive isolation after divergence may not be the same barriers that were important in reducing gene flow during the initial stages of the speciation process (Butlin et al., ; Coyne & Orr, ; Turelli et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In polyandrous species, ejaculate × female reproductive tract interactions are subject to rapid coevolution and diversification, thought to result from postcopulatory sexual selection (sperm competition and cryptic female choice) and sexually antagonistic coevolution (Birkhead & Pizzari, 2002; Firman et al., 2017; Meslin et al., 2017; Sirot et al., 2015; but see Dapper & Wade, 2020). Thus, despite holding a central role in fertilization, ejaculate and female reproductive tract traits often show elevated rates of molecular and morphological evolution (Ahmed‐Braimah et al., 2017; McGeary & Findlay, 2020; Meslin et al., 2017; Rowe et al., 2015; Simmons & Fitzpatrick, 2019; VanKuren & Long, 2018). Divergence between populations in these traits is predicted to result in the early emergence of reproductive isolation that occurs after mating but before fertilization (postmating prezygotic; PMPZ) (Gavrilets, 2000; Lande, 1981; Panhuis et al., 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When genetically manipulated, some Sfps elicit PMPZ‐like phenotypes such as sperm storage abnormalities or reduced oviposition rates (LaFlamme et al., 2012; Ravi Ram & Wolfner, 2007). Moreover, differences in Sfp expression between species, and abnormal gene expression profiles or changes in protein abundance in the female reproductive tract after mating with heterospecific vs. conspecific males are associated with PMPZ isolation (Ahmed‐Braimah et al., 2017; Bono et al., 2011; McCullough et al., 2020). Recently, ectopic injection of Sfps between populations of simultaneously hermaphroditic freshwater snails, Lymnaea stagnalis , that showed divergent gene expression patterns was shown to alter fecundity and sperm transfer (Nakadera et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%