2014
DOI: 10.4238/2014.november.27.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary dynamics of rDNA genes on chromosomes of the Eucinostomus fishes: cytotaxonomic and karyoevolutive implications

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Several chromosomal features of Gerreidae fish have been found to be conserved. In this group, it is unclear whether the high degree of chromosomal stasis is maintained when analyzing more dynamic regions of chromosomes, such as rDNA sites that generally show a higher level of variability. Thus, cytogenetic analyses were performed on 3 Atlantic species of the genus Eucinostomus using conventional banding (C-banding, Ag-NOR), AT-and GC-specific fluorochromes, and fluorescence in situ hybridization map… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The syntenic arrangement of these rDNA classes, as found in Halichoeres and Thalassoma , is not a common feature, although it has already been reported in some main fish orders, such as Perciformes (Ghigliotti et al 2008, Merlo et al 2013), Characiformes (Vicari et al 2006, Bellafronte et al 2009, Cioffi et al 2009), Siluriformes (Mariotto et al 2011, Ziemniczak et al 2012), Anguilliformes (Deiana et al 2006), Salmoniformes (Pendás et al 1994), Nototheniformes (Ghigliotti et al 2007) and Tetraodontiformes (Martinez et al 2010). In fishes, 45S/5S rDNA arrays are phylogenetically stochastic and limited to few species of a clade (Almeida-Toledo et al 2002), and preferentially explained by random events in the course of the evolutionary trajectory of the genome (Calado et al 2014). Thus, the phylogenetic spread of these arrangements in the Julidini clade indicates a noteworthy evolutionary stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The syntenic arrangement of these rDNA classes, as found in Halichoeres and Thalassoma , is not a common feature, although it has already been reported in some main fish orders, such as Perciformes (Ghigliotti et al 2008, Merlo et al 2013), Characiformes (Vicari et al 2006, Bellafronte et al 2009, Cioffi et al 2009), Siluriformes (Mariotto et al 2011, Ziemniczak et al 2012), Anguilliformes (Deiana et al 2006), Salmoniformes (Pendás et al 1994), Nototheniformes (Ghigliotti et al 2007) and Tetraodontiformes (Martinez et al 2010). In fishes, 45S/5S rDNA arrays are phylogenetically stochastic and limited to few species of a clade (Almeida-Toledo et al 2002), and preferentially explained by random events in the course of the evolutionary trajectory of the genome (Calado et al 2014). Thus, the phylogenetic spread of these arrangements in the Julidini clade indicates a noteworthy evolutionary stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the two Halichoeres species, all the 5S rDNA sites exhibit a syntenic 18S/5S arrangement. Syntenic arrangements of ribosomal genes are a derived condition in Perciformes (Nakajima et al, 2012;Calado et al, 2014;Costa et al, 2016) and Characiformes (Voltolin et al, 2013), and this exclusive feature in both Halichoeres species demonstrates that this organization does not interfere with the gene function. The similarity in the organization of ribosomal genes in the Thalassoma and Halichoeres genera indicates a symplesiomorphic condition in the Julidini species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The location of 18S and 5S rRNA genes has been proved to be efficient cytotaxonomic markers in distinct marine fish groups like Gerreidae (Calado et al, 2013(Calado et al, , 2014, Lutjanidae (Rocha and Molina, 2008), and Nototheniidae (Pisano and Ghigliotti, 2009). Usually, both families of these ribosomal genes are not syntenic (Gornung, 2013), as observed in Acanthurus (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%