2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10646-011-0627-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary ecotoxicology of pesticide resistance: a case study in Daphnia

Abstract: Natural populations that are exposed to pesticides in their environment may at the same time be exposed to natural stressors like parasites and predators, which may interact with pesticide exposure. This may not only impact target pest species but also a wide variety of non-target species. This review reports on a joint research program in the water flea Daphnia magna, a non-target species often used as model organism in ecology and ecotoxicology. The focus is on different aspects that are of key importance to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
71
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
4
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This expansion might prove important because genetic variation among hosts or parasite genotypes in toxicological traits [38,39] could lead to diverse responses to contamination within and among populations. Furthermore, rapid evolution of hosts during epidemics [21] and/or to contamination [38,39] might change the predictions offered here-especially if tradeoffs exist between toxicological and epidemiological traits among host genotypes [38,39]. Second, we viewed contamination scenarios as distinct, yet constant, environments, which provided a useful qualitative prediction here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This expansion might prove important because genetic variation among hosts or parasite genotypes in toxicological traits [38,39] could lead to diverse responses to contamination within and among populations. Furthermore, rapid evolution of hosts during epidemics [21] and/or to contamination [38,39] might change the predictions offered here-especially if tradeoffs exist between toxicological and epidemiological traits among host genotypes [38,39]. Second, we viewed contamination scenarios as distinct, yet constant, environments, which provided a useful qualitative prediction here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the evolution of pesticide tolerance in pest species is estimated to cause >$1.5 billion in crop losses each year (Pimentel, 2005). Despite our increasing knowledge of evolved pesticide tolerance in pest species, few studies have explored whether pesticide tolerance has evolved in nontarget species that are inadvertently exposed to these chemicals (Brausch & Smith, 2009a,b; Jansen, Coors, Stoks, & De Meester, 2011). Pesticide application for pest control is typically localized; however, processes such as aerial drift, runoff, and movement through food webs can distribute pesticides across the landscape potentially shaping the evolutionary courses of natural populations (Gilliom, 2007; Stone, Gilliom, & Ryberg, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theory suggests that the evolution of pesticide tolerance can be achieved via two mechanisms: selection for constitutive tolerance over multiple generations or by inducing tolerance within a single generation via phenotypic plasticity (Cothran et al., 2013; Hua et al., 2015; Jansen et al., 2011). The evolution of constitutive tolerance is more likely when populations are in close proximity to agriculture (<200 m) and consistently exposed to pesticides (Crispo, 2007; Declerck et al., 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, non-target populations are increasingly exposed to a broad range of pesticides that vary in mode of action and frequency of use (Grube et al, 2011;Newman, 2010;Ritter, 2009). Given the complex chemical milieu that non-target populations frequently encounter in nature, there is a need to explore how pesticides influence evolutionary processes in these populations (Jansen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%