2018
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b09089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Effects on Bound Substrate pKa in Dihydrofolate Reductase

Abstract: In the present study, we address the effect of active site structure and dynamics of different dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) isoforms on the pK a of the bound substrate 7,8-dihydrofolate, in an attempt to understand possible evolutionary trends. We apply a hybrid QM/MM free energy perturbation method to estimate the pK a of the N5 position of the bound substrate. We observe a gradual increase in N5 basicity as we move from primitive to more evolved DHFR isoforms. Structural analysis of these isoforms reveals … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
4
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Met20 loop has been suggested to play two important roles during the catalyzed hydride transfer: i) keeping the folate substrate next to the cofactor and ii) protecting the substrate reactive N5 site (Figure c) from the polar aqueous solvent . These two aspects can be best understood using a theoretical model that established that hydride‐ (and proton‐) transfer free energy barriers sensitively depend on the rearrangement of two coordinates: first, the electrostatic environment which reorganizes to stabilize the nascent product charge distribution, and second the contraction of the hydride donor–acceptor distance (here CC) which facilitates the transfer (the third coordinate is the displacement of the hydride particle, which adapts very fast to the two other slower coordinates).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Met20 loop has been suggested to play two important roles during the catalyzed hydride transfer: i) keeping the folate substrate next to the cofactor and ii) protecting the substrate reactive N5 site (Figure c) from the polar aqueous solvent . These two aspects can be best understood using a theoretical model that established that hydride‐ (and proton‐) transfer free energy barriers sensitively depend on the rearrangement of two coordinates: first, the electrostatic environment which reorganizes to stabilize the nascent product charge distribution, and second the contraction of the hydride donor–acceptor distance (here CC) which facilitates the transfer (the third coordinate is the displacement of the hydride particle, which adapts very fast to the two other slower coordinates).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the Protein Data Bank (PDB) has collected over one hundred structures obtained from both eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms (humans, Escherichia coli , Lactobacillus casei , Pneumocystis carinii , Micobacterium tuberculosis , etc. ), alone or in complex with different ligands [16]. Briefly, DHFR consists of eight sheets, which form a rigid skeleton: seven sheets run parallel and the other runs antiparallel.…”
Section: Physiological Role and Structure Of Dhfrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid or limit the occurrence of additional hydrogen bonding to catalytic bases, enzymes have evolved active site architectures that can promote desolvation to increase carboxylate reactivity. Such desolvation can for example be achieved by loop closure (as in triosephosphate isomerase and dihydrofolate reductase) 63,64 or closure of the substrate binding cleft (as in ketosteroid synthase). Here, subtle control of the solvation around the carboxylated Lys73 is related to nearby hydrophobic residues (Val120 and Leu158), which can adopt conformations that allow the presence of the deacylating water but avoid more extensive solvation of the catalytic carboxylate.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%