“…Strictly interpreted, Emery’s rule postulates a sister group relationship between host and parasite, whereas a less restrictive or “loose” interpretation signifies for example a congeneric, but not necessarily a sister taxon relationship ( 13 , 31 – 33 ). Consequently, two competing hypotheses were developed for explaining the speciation mechanisms of social parasites: 1) The interspecific hypothesis proposes that host and social parasite evolved reproductive isolation in allopatry, whereas 2) the intraspecific hypothesis postulates that the social parasite evolved directly from its host in sympatry ( 3 , 13 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 31 – 37 ). Empirical studies of temporary, dulotic, and host queen-intolerant workerless ant social parasites generally provide support for the interspecific hypothesis ( 14 , 38 – 48 ), whereas recent phylogenetic studies lend support to the intraspecific hypothesis for queen-tolerant inquilines ( 33 , 36 , 49 – 51 ).…”