2014
DOI: 10.1109/tsmc.2013.2290506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Location and Pricing Strategies in Competitive Hierarchical Distribution Systems: A Spatial Agent-Based Model

Abstract: Facing horizontal channel competition in a hierarchical distribution system, independent intermediaries such as wholesalers and retailers are keen to find the optimal location and pricing strategies that enable them to adapt to the increasingly competitive business environment. To help market intermediaries to address their challenges, we propose in this paper a spatial agent-based model (SAM), grounded in complex adaptive systems, which comprises four types of agents, namely the world, the manufacturer, firms… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior studies reported in [38] and [39] are excellent references for this future research direction. Last but not least, competition issues [40] under QRS in the SC with multiple hospitals (i.e., multiple retail-buyers [43]) may also be examined in the future. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies reported in [38] and [39] are excellent references for this future research direction. Last but not least, competition issues [40] under QRS in the SC with multiple hospitals (i.e., multiple retail-buyers [43]) may also be examined in the future. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, different kinds of stochastic inventory control systems are proposed and explored (see [ 3 9 ] and [ 10 , 11 ]). The ( Q,r )-based optimal inventory control policy is one of them and has been popularly examined.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, the agent can often be attributed to different categories or goals in which members are overlapping and interrelated [10], [11]. For example, in virtual organizations [12], [13] and wireless networks [14], [15], an agent with sufficient resources is able to apply for joining several completely different cooperative coalitions to earn more profits or achieve more objectives. The reason for this is that overlapping coalitions make it possible for agents to form a coalition for each task, without preventing other tasks from being satisfied [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%