“…It was discovered that 75 combinations of metrics and state-of-theart methods were mapped and compared out of which 60 (80%) stated that the QA performed better, 7 (9.33%) stated they have equivalent performance, and 8 (10.67%) showed that QA has lower performance. The most widely used stateof-the-art method for comparison was found to be simulated annealing as indicated by 21 (42%) of the 50 research which include [130], [149], [152], [154], [161], [168], [171], [189], [212], [217], [218], [223], [229], [238], [239], [242], [243], [246], [249], [251], [252]. This is due to the fact that QA is analogous to simulated annealing (classical approach) but in substitution of thermal activation by quantum tunneling.…”