Evolutionary multi-objective optimisation with preferences for multivariable PI controller tuning

Abstract

Highlights• We present an evolutionary multiobjective optimisation approach for PI controller tuning.• This approach incorporates designer´s preferences into the optimisation process.• The methodology is evaluated in a multivariable process.• It is possible to improve pertinency of the approximated Pareto front. AbstractMulti-objective optimisation design procedures have shown to be a valuable tool for control engineers. They enable the designer having a close embedment of the tuning process for a wide variety of applications. In such procedures, evolutionary multi-objective optimisation has been extensively used for PI and PID controller tuning; one reason for this is due to their flexibility to include mechanisms in order to enhance convergence and diversity. Although its usability, when dealing with multi-variable processes, the resulting Pareto front approximation might not be useful, due to the number of design objectives stated. That is, a vast region of the objective space might be impractical or useless a priori, due to the strong degradation in some of the design objectives. In this paper preference handling techniques are incorporated into the optimisation process, seeking to improve the pertinency of the approximated Pareto front for multi-variable PI controller tuning. That is, the inclusion of preferences into the optimisation process, in order to seek actively for a pertinent Pareto front approximation. With such approach, it is possible to tune a multi-variable PI controller, fulfilling several design objectives, using previous knowledge from the designer on the expected trade-off performance. This is validated with a well-known benchmark example in multi-variable control. Control tests show the usefulness of the proposed approach when compared with other tuning techniques.

Optimised inverter by switch sharing: a control solution for photovoltaic applications

“…Hence, parameter tuning is normally carried out to make the controller adaptive so that proper adjustment can be made to suit the different load conditions. Many tuning methods can be found from the literature, such as stochastic multi‐parameters divergence optimisation [31, 32], simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation [33, 34] and artificial‐intelligence‐based optimisation [35, 36]. In most cases, the tuning is concentrated more on the proportional and integral gains.…”

Optimum PI/PID Controllers Tuning via an Evolutionary Algorithm

“…Evolutionary algorithms (EA) have been proved to be an effective tool to optimal PID controllers tuning [5]. In general, EA is considered as an optimal algorithm that is able to deal with illdefined problem domain such as multimodality, discontinuity, time variance, randomness and noise [6].…”

“…In Section 3, the (EA) MAGO is presented and the evolutionary design procedure of a PID controller is established. In Section 4, a selection of some representative benchmark systems from [5] is carried out, and the respectively 2DoF PID controllers are tuned. In Section 5, a power electronic converter (DC-DC buck converter) is adopted as a case study, and based on its nonlinear dynamical model, a PI controller is tuned by MAGO.…”

Using a Multiobjective Approach to Compare Multiple Design Alternatives—An Application to Battery Dynamic Model Tuning

“…A multiobjective optimization problem (MOP) [7][8][9] deals with multiple design objectives, optimizing all of them simultaneously [10]. The solution to these types of problems is not unique.…”