2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2205.01752
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary optimization of cosmological parameters using metropolis acceptance criterion

Abstract: We introduce a novel evolutionary method that takes leverage from the MCMC method that can be used for constraining the parameters and theoretical models of Cosmology. Unlike the MCMC technique, which is essentially a non-parallel algorithm by design, the newly proposed algorithm is able to obtain the full potential of multi-core machines. With this algorithm, we could obtain the best-fit parameters of the ΛCDM cosmological model and identify the discrepancy in the Hubble parameter H 0 . In the present work we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the presented study, we show the prospect of using them as a complement within cosmological data analysis. This is in agreement and complementary with the existing research that also focuses on the statistical applications of evolutionary computation [39,120]. In our case, we have not proposed a novel method or algorithm; however, we have analyzed how to use GAs so that they can complement a traditional analysis of cosmological data and be an alternative to optimize the likelihood function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…With the presented study, we show the prospect of using them as a complement within cosmological data analysis. This is in agreement and complementary with the existing research that also focuses on the statistical applications of evolutionary computation [39,120]. In our case, we have not proposed a novel method or algorithm; however, we have analyzed how to use GAs so that they can complement a traditional analysis of cosmological data and be an alternative to optimize the likelihood function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%