2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142x.2010.00402.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary origin of the insect wing via integration of two developmental modules

Abstract: Insect wing is a key evolutionary innovation for insect radiation, but its origins and intermediate forms are absent from the fossil record. To understand the ancestral state of the wing, expression of three key regulatory genes in insect wing development, wingless (wg), vestigial (vg), and apterous (ap) was studied in two basal insects, mayfly and bristletail. These basal insects develop dorsal limb branches, tracheal gill and stylus, respectively, that have been considered candidates for wing origin. Here we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
104
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
8
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, nub affected leg-adjacent morphology of the Oncopeltus T1 ventral thorax and was expressed only in the blade portion of the T2 wing but not the adjacent scutellum, similar to the way nub is expressed only in the posterior compartment of crustacean gills (23). Starting with fossil evidence (42) and continuing with developmental data (18,23,25,32,33) and present insights from Oncopeltus, genes expressed in crustacean gills appear to mark a cell population that evolved into both tracheae and wings in insects. In wings, the fusion of both dorsal and ventral contributions appears to be required for formation of fully developed and functional wings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, nub affected leg-adjacent morphology of the Oncopeltus T1 ventral thorax and was expressed only in the blade portion of the T2 wing but not the adjacent scutellum, similar to the way nub is expressed only in the posterior compartment of crustacean gills (23). Starting with fossil evidence (42) and continuing with developmental data (18,23,25,32,33) and present insights from Oncopeltus, genes expressed in crustacean gills appear to mark a cell population that evolved into both tracheae and wings in insects. In wings, the fusion of both dorsal and ventral contributions appears to be required for formation of fully developed and functional wings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dorsal appendages such as the tracheal gill or stylus are like the Drosophila wing in that they express wg and vg and may represent evolutionary precursors to the wing (54). Unlike the wing, however, they do not form close to a region where ap is also expressed, which may be essential for an outgrowth to form a flat structure like the wing (54). Vn/Egfr signaling is upstream of ap and therefore a prerequisite for wing formation (12).…”
Section: Vn/egfr Positive Feedback Loop-an Example Of a Community Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a combination of these ideas, it has been proposed that the wing may have a leg origin but that the ability to form a flat wing-like structure depends upon proximity to the dorsal-lateral boundary in the side body (the paranotal lobe in wingless forms) (54). Dorsal appendages such as the tracheal gill or stylus are like the Drosophila wing in that they express wg and vg and may represent evolutionary precursors to the wing (54). Unlike the wing, however, they do not form close to a region where ap is also expressed, which may be essential for an outgrowth to form a flat structure like the wing (54).…”
Section: Vn/egfr Positive Feedback Loop-an Example Of a Community Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By adopting the use of tracheation, we do not imply anything regarding wing origins as it relates to the defunct "exite" or "gill hypothesis" for overall wing homology, that is, wings as serial homologs with abdominal gills found in some crown-group naiads (e.g., Landois, 1871;Wigglesworth, 1976;KukalovĂĄ-Peck, 1978, 1983, 1991, which is in opposition to the "paranotal hypothesis" (e.g., MĂŒller, 1873aMĂŒller, , 1873bMĂŒller, , 1875Crampton, 1916;Hamilton, 1971Hamilton, , 1972aWootton, 1976;Rasnitsyn, 1981). Instead, wings have been more recently determined to be of largely notal origin with the incorporation of subcoxal elements to form an articulation at the base, also known as the dual model hypothesis (e.g., Grimaldi and Engel, 2005;Niwa et al, 2010;Engel et al, 2013;Prokop et al, 2017). In this context, the tracheae of the wing represent nothing more than similar tracheation of any body structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%