2007
DOI: 10.3852/mycologia.99.1.59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary relationships among Ascochyta species infecting wild and cultivated hosts in the legume tribes Cicereae and Vicieae

Abstract: Evolutionary relationships were inferred among a worldwide sample of Ascochyta fungi from wild and cultivated legume hosts based on phylogenetic analyses of DNA sequences from the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS), as well as portions of three protein-coding genes: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase (G3PD), translation elongation factor 1-alpha (EF) and chitin synthase 1 (CHS). All legume-associated Ascochyta species had nearly identical ITS sequences and clustered with other Ascochyta,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lawyer [28] clearly differentiated the three species with tan colored spots delineated by distinct margin as A. pisi, concentric lesions/spots as A. pinodes, and the one causing foot rot as A. pinodella. These symptoms resemble the description made by various workers [25,28,30,36,41]. It was interesting to note that of the four isolates placed in group I exhibited two types of leaf spots, i.e., small tan colored (2-6 mm) to large irregular up to 15 mm spots with concentric rings and resembled group II; in addition, these isolates showed marked variation in symptoms under artificial and natural conditions, and are thus categorized as A. pisi and A. pinodella.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Lawyer [28] clearly differentiated the three species with tan colored spots delineated by distinct margin as A. pisi, concentric lesions/spots as A. pinodes, and the one causing foot rot as A. pinodella. These symptoms resemble the description made by various workers [25,28,30,36,41]. It was interesting to note that of the four isolates placed in group I exhibited two types of leaf spots, i.e., small tan colored (2-6 mm) to large irregular up to 15 mm spots with concentric rings and resembled group II; in addition, these isolates showed marked variation in symptoms under artificial and natural conditions, and are thus categorized as A. pisi and A. pinodella.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…ITS sequences were clearly heterogenous enough to separate A. pisi from other two species. FarisMokaiesh et al [18] on the basis of PCR-RFLP of IGS whereas Barve et al [7] and Peever et al [36] on the basis of ITS sequences also differentiated A. pisi from A. pinodes and A. pinodella. Moreover, A. pisi showed lower mean/net genetic distance with A. rabiei group than A. pinodes/A.…”
Section: Molecular Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations