2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.langcom.2016.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary roots of sound symbolism. Association tasks of animal properties with phonetic features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the empirical prudence of Imai and Kita’s account, which focuses mainly on how iconicity can make iconic words easier to learn, studies citing and summarizing it often extend its claims to the subsequent “learning of non-iconic words” ( Massaro & Perlman, 2017 , p. 10), to “infant’s word learning” in general ( De Carolis et al, 2017 ), or even more broadly to “language learning” ( Perry et al, 2017 ; Sidhu & Pexman, 2017 ). It is clear from this that for many scholars, iconic bootstrapping extends far beyond the learning of iconic words.…”
Section: Iconicity and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the empirical prudence of Imai and Kita’s account, which focuses mainly on how iconicity can make iconic words easier to learn, studies citing and summarizing it often extend its claims to the subsequent “learning of non-iconic words” ( Massaro & Perlman, 2017 , p. 10), to “infant’s word learning” in general ( De Carolis et al, 2017 ), or even more broadly to “language learning” ( Perry et al, 2017 ; Sidhu & Pexman, 2017 ). It is clear from this that for many scholars, iconic bootstrapping extends far beyond the learning of iconic words.…”
Section: Iconicity and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the empirical prudence of Imai and Kita's account, which focuses mainly on how iconicity can make iconic words easier to learn, studies citing and summarizing it often extend its claims to the subsequent "learning of non-iconic words" (Massaro & Perlman, 2017, p. 10), to "infant's word learning" in general (De Carolis et al, 2017), or even more broadly to "language learning" (Perry et al, 2017;Sidhu & Pexman, 2017). It is clear from this that for many scholars, iconic bootstrapping extends far beyond the learning of iconic words.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the /ŋ/ in the English onomatopoeia /diŋ.dɔŋ/ seems to be characteristic of the reverberating echo of a bell tolling, while the alternating /i/ and /ɔ/ seems characteristic of movement or a fluctuation in pitch as the bell tolls. While various studies have worked to elicit submorphemic sound-to-meaning phoneme correspondences (McCune 1983;Maduka 1988;Oswalt 1994;Rhodes 1994;Hamano 1998;in press;Hutchins 1998;Blust 2003;Ofori 2009;Assaneo et al 2011;Urban 2011;Akita et al 2013;Ayalew 2013;Kwon & Round 2015;Blasi et al 2016;Akita 2017;De Carolis et al 2017;Strickland et al 2017; Aryani 2018;Kawahara et al 2018;Shih et al 2018), the underlying mechanisms which allow for such correspondences in spoken language remain unclear (cf. Emmorey 2014 for signed language; cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%