SAE Technical Paper Series 2005
DOI: 10.4271/2005-01-0750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary Safety Testing of Embedded Control Software by Automatically Generating Compact Test Data Sequences

Abstract: Whereas the verification of non-safety-related, embedded software typically focuses on demonstrating that the implementation fulfills its functional requirements, this is not sufficient for safety-relevant systems. In this case, the control software must also meet application-specific safety requirements.Safety requirements typically arise from the application of hazard and/or safety analysis techniques, e.g. FMEA, FTA or SHARD. During the downstream development process it must be shown that these requirements… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of our developed criteria were fulfilled by all of the studies, exceptions being [34,35,12,15,54] where evidence of a comparison group was missing, but these quality differences were not found to be largely confounded with study outcomes. What follows next is the list of developed criteria:…”
Section: Study Quality Assessment and Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Most of our developed criteria were fulfilled by all of the studies, exceptions being [34,35,12,15,54] where evidence of a comparison group was missing, but these quality differences were not found to be largely confounded with study outcomes. What follows next is the list of developed criteria:…”
Section: Study Quality Assessment and Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In Baresel et al [15,54], an evolutionary testing approach using genetic algorithms was presented for structural and functional sequence testing. For complex dynamic system like car control systems, long input sequences were necessary to simulate these systems.…”
Section: Number Of Uncovered T-subsetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Der Unterschied der Struktur gegenüber Abbildung 7.5 ist, dass sowohl Gütefunktion als auch Simulationsanwendung hier lediglich auf lokale Variablen zugreifen. Eine detaillierte Beschreibung des Anwendungsproblems sowie der sequentiellen Implementierung findet sich in[88]. parallel abzuarbeitenden Teilaufgaben entsprechen in diesem Anwendungsfall den Gütewertberechnungen unterschiedlicher Individuen innerhalb eines Iterationsschrittes.Während der Abarbeitung einer Teilaufgabe ist keine Koordination mit anderen Instanzen notwendig, während die Teilaufgaben mehrfach, das heisst zu jedem Iterationsschritt des Optimierungsalgorithmus, abzuarbeiten sind.…”
unclassified