2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-010-0414-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionistic or revolutionary paths? A PACS maturity model for strategic situational planning

Abstract: The proposed method allows hospitals to strategically plan for PACS maturation. It is situational in that the required investments and activities depend on the alignment between the hospital strategy and the selected growth path. The inclusion of both strategic alignment and maturity growth path concepts make the planning method rigorous, and provide a framework for further empirical research and clinical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Highlighted in Table 2, the CAMM differs from many generic adoption models, such as the diffusion of innovation, TAM, and UTAUT, as it is contextualized to the clinical domain. And, unlike several clinical adoption models, such as the PACS maturity model [32,33], the HIMSS EMRAMs [29,30], or EMR Adoption Model [34], the CAMM is less focused on purely feature adoption and is also is generic enough to be applied to a range of clinical adoption contexts and clinical information systems from personal health records to hospital systems. CAMM is explicitly focused on the measurable outcomes that are linked to integration of IT into clinical practice over time, unlike the FITT [9] or Design-Reality Gap model [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Highlighted in Table 2, the CAMM differs from many generic adoption models, such as the diffusion of innovation, TAM, and UTAUT, as it is contextualized to the clinical domain. And, unlike several clinical adoption models, such as the PACS maturity model [32,33], the HIMSS EMRAMs [29,30], or EMR Adoption Model [34], the CAMM is less focused on purely feature adoption and is also is generic enough to be applied to a range of clinical adoption contexts and clinical information systems from personal health records to hospital systems. CAMM is explicitly focused on the measurable outcomes that are linked to integration of IT into clinical practice over time, unlike the FITT [9] or Design-Reality Gap model [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnostic imaging have models to describe capability for collaborative jurisdictional infrastructure maturity [31]. The PACS maturity model [32,33] describes the process maturity of hospital based PACS systems in terms of functionality and integration into practice workflow. The EMR (Electronic Medical Records) Adoption Model [34] provides an adoption assessment tool that breaks down office-based EMR adoption into 10 functional areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategic focus indicator was the most prevalent, with an emphasis on quality and safety [ 26 - 28 ], sustainability and cost effectiveness [ 39 ], and ensuring the systematic evaluation of quantifiable results and objectives [ 24 , 26 - 28 ]. While the strategic focus indicator centers on the core elements that health care organizations focus on, the strategic alignment indicator details the need for the digital strategy to be aligned with the organizational strategy [ 12 , 43 ]. To accomplish this, the digital strategy needs to be grounded on clinical benefits and outcomes [ 1 , 11 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, following our alignment models' logic, firms can define improvement activities that can be executed along the various dimension of our model under the following conditions: (1) investments meet a firms' current and future assessed needs; they are conditional on given situations such as the given state of alignment and the specified strategic alignment direction and (2) improvement activities are done simultaneously and hence by an integrated management perspective. In practice, firms define their own improvement roadmaps incrementally, radical or both as a strategy (Van de Wetering, Batenburg, & Lederman, 2010). In the course of the execution of all improvement activities, the level of alignment between the dimensions should be monitored so that synergies between improvement projects are developed.…”
Section: Toward Alignment Assessments In Practicementioning
confidence: 99%