Proceedings of the Fortieth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing 2008
DOI: 10.1145/1374376.1374465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolvability from learning algorithms

Abstract: Valiant has recently introduced a framework for analyzing the capabilities and the limitations of the evolutionary process of random change guided by selection [24]. In his framework the process of acquiring a complex functionality is viewed as a substantially restricted form of PAC learning of an unknown function from a certain set of functions [23]. Valiant showed that classes of functions evolvable in his model are also learnable in the statistical query (SQ) model of Kearns [16] and asked whether the conv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
59
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the introduction of the evolvability model by L. Valiant in [11], significant work has been done to show both the power and the robustness to modeling variations of this computational framework for investigating how complexity can arise in a fixed environment [2,3,4,7,10]. In this work we present two complementary constructions, which extend this body of work in a new and very natural direction: while previous papers studied evolvability of Boolean functions (from {0, 1} n → {−1, 1}) we here consider functions from R n → R m .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the introduction of the evolvability model by L. Valiant in [11], significant work has been done to show both the power and the robustness to modeling variations of this computational framework for investigating how complexity can arise in a fixed environment [2,3,4,7,10]. In this work we present two complementary constructions, which extend this body of work in a new and very natural direction: while previous papers studied evolvability of Boolean functions (from {0, 1} n → {−1, 1}) we here consider functions from R n → R m .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the original Boolean framework of evolvability, Feldman showed that, as long as the underlying distribution is known, then the class SQ (statistical queries) defined by Kearns in [8] exactly characterizes the classes of evolvable functions [2]. SQ is both a powerful and natural framework, and seems to capture most of the power of PAC learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most classical approach in computational learning theory is to study this within the approximately correct (PAC) learning framework of Valiant [14]. Recently, it has been shown that a large class of functions is evolvable, i. e. PAC learnable by an evolutionary algorithm [15,3,4]. However, the goal of these papers is to understand natural evolution from a theoretical point of view rather than giving explanations why and how evolutionary algorithms that are used in practice work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive presentation of the different results obtained in the field of combinatorial optimization can be found in [22]. Additionally, recent theoretical studies have investigated the learning ability of evolutionary algorithms [9,26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%