2016
DOI: 10.1057/9781137543127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolving Agendas in European English-Medium Higher Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…reasons (Earls, 2016). In the midst of this growth are language learners and content teachers who are working in two or more languages in EMI schools, with a focus on the content of subjects such as maths and science.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reasons (Earls, 2016). In the midst of this growth are language learners and content teachers who are working in two or more languages in EMI schools, with a focus on the content of subjects such as maths and science.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, offering programs through English breaks down language barriers for international faculty, and thus, attracts the highest qualified and most knowledgeable lecturers, and researchers. Similarly, the adoption of EMI programs opens doors for international students and increases revenue; and thirdly, EMI provides, creates, and fosters an international environment which benefits the local university's staff and students (Earls 2016;. The term EMI has come to refer to many different types of programs, in fact, implementation and practice of EMI differs according to each institution's, and nation's language policy and goals.…”
Section: English-medium Instruction In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third type employs Spolsky's framework to analyze the influences of the language policies on the language practices at university level. The studies of Hilgendorf (2005), Erling and Hilgendorf (2006) and Earls (2016) have recognized the importance of BP and Erasmus as the most influential initiatives and noticed some main policy actors at the German federal level, such as the influence of BMBF, DAAD and HRK's policy documents on EMI, but they have mainly chosen one or some universities to explore the influence and have made no systematic attempt to analyze their institutional language ideologies. Also, the study concerning the interrelationship between these institutional language ideologies and the actual EMI practices in German HEIs in general is lacking.…”
Section: Researches On Emi In Germanymentioning
confidence: 99%