2014 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering &Amp; Economics (CIFEr) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/cifer.2014.6924112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolving hybrid neural fuzzy network for realized volatility forecasting with jumps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison purposes, volatility forecasts are done using alternative evolving fuzzy systems, such as eTS [20], xTS [21], eTS+ [22], eCloud [9], and eHFN [10]. Moreover, we consider also a multi layer feedforward neural network.…”
Section: B Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For comparison purposes, volatility forecasts are done using alternative evolving fuzzy systems, such as eTS [20], xTS [21], eTS+ [22], eCloud [9], and eHFN [10]. Moreover, we consider also a multi layer feedforward neural network.…”
Section: B Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] and [10] suggested the use of a cloud-based evolving fuzzy model (eCloud) and a hybrid neural fuzzy network (eHFN) for volatility forecasting with jumps, respectively. The authors showed the high potential of evolving fuzzy modeling approaches in terms of accuracy, outperforming traditional econometric techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are nonlinear approaches that use lagged sample path and jump components from high-frequency data. For instance, [27] and [28] use a cloud-based evolving fuzzy model (eCloud) and a hybrid evolving neural fuzzy networks (eHFN), respectively, for volatility forecasting with jumps, and show that their accuracy are higher than traditional econometric techniques. Notably, the cloud-based evolving and neural fuzzy approaches embed a clustering mechanism that naturally captures volatility clustering stylized fact of financial time series.…”
Section: A Realized Volatility With Jumps Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ePFM is a non-linear, adaptive, and robust approach for realized volatility modeling. The results produced by ePFM are compared with the HAR [14] benchmark, with traditional artificial neural networks such as MLP and ANFIS, and with the evolving fuzzy models xTS [56], eTS+ [33], eCloud [27], and eHFN [28]. Comparisons are made using Value-at-Risk (VaR) estimates.…”
Section: Computational Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no direct volatility forecasts, based on literature. Moreover, NN seem to provide accurate realized volatility forecasts(Rosa et al, 2014). However, there is no direct link between each parameter selection and the properties of realized volatilities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%