Evolving in isolation: Genetic tests reject recent connections of Amazonian savannas with the central Cerrado

Abstract

Aim The effects of past climatic shifts remain enigmatic for the Amazon region, especially for islands of savanna within the tropical forest known as “Amazonian savannas” (AS). These disjunct savanna areas share many plant and animal species with the Cerrado biome in central Brazil (the CC), fuelling debate over historical connections. We evaluate hypothesized corridors between the CC and the AS, and specifically investigate whether a history of isolation versus recent connections is supported by genetic tests. Location Cerrado and Amazon biomes. Taxon Two woody plant species: Byrsonima coccolobifolia and B. crassifolia (Malpighiaceae). Methods Analyses of genomic data (SNPs from more than 4,500 loci) in 28 populations, as well as chloroplast DNA (cpDNA), were used to test for parallel geographic structuring between the CC and AS—an expected structure if putative corridors provided regional connections between different areas of the CC and AS, and divergence times between the CC and AS were estimated using a composite‐likelihood method based on the site frequency spectrum. Results Genomic data, in contrast with cpDNA, generally show strong, concordant genetic structure between the CC and AS in both species, rather than regional grouping of CC with AS populations. In addition, divergence between the CC and AS predates the Last Glacial Maximum. Main conclusions Our results suggest the AS have remained relatively isolated from the CC even though the strong structure of genomic variation is not shared by cpDNA. We note that past evidence of putative corridors between the CC and AS based solely on cpDNA should be interpreted cautiously since the lack of structure may reflect limited genetic resolution rather than gene flow. As such, the uniqueness of AS may be more pronounced than previously thought, highlighting the importance of protecting these highly threatened areas.

Disentangling the Environmental Factors That Shape Genetic and Phenotypic Leaf Trait Variation in the Tree Qualea grandiflora Across the Brazilian Savanna

“…Likewise, phylogeographic studies show similar differentiation between northern and southern portions of the Cerrado biome, also attributed to Pleistocene climate change (Novaes et al, 2010; Novaes et al, 2013; Buzatti et al, 2018). Moreover, our results corroborate the isolation among different regions in the Amazon, since SAN and HTA in central and southwestern parts of the Amazon, respectively, were found to belong to distinct genetic groups (see Buzatti et al, 2018; Resende-Moreira et al, 2018).…”

The dominant mesopredator and savanna formations shape the distribution of the rare northern tiger cat (Leopardus tigrinus) in the Amazon

“…Colonization of the northern savanna formations of the Amazon by the N-tiger cat likely occurred during the forest-savanna shifts of the glacial period 18 , and the cat currently shows a patchy distribution. Strong evidence of established biogeographic corridor connections between the savannas of the Cerrado and those of the Amazon exists, suggesting northward expansion of the former during glacial periods, perhaps predating the Last Glacial Maximum 19 – 21 . Further corroborating this evidence, tiger cat ‘gene flow’ niche modelling showed prior connectivity between the Guiana population and that of Central Brazil and no connectivity with the Andean population 22 .…”

Comparative and predictive phylogeography in the South American diagonal of open formations: Unravelling the biological and environmental influences on multitaxon demography

“…Repurposing traditional data via such analyses can lead to new insights (Bagley et al, 2018; Carstens et al, 2018). Furthermore, although single‐locus data are still used, genomic data are beginning to accumulate for DOF lineages (Perez et al, 2016; Resende‐Moreira et al, 2019; Vasconcellos et al, 2019). These data will increase the resolution of both traditional phylogeographical (Garrick et al, 2015) and predictive or hierarchical (Xue & Hickerson, 2017) analyses.…”