2013 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Vehicles and Transportation Systems (CIVTS) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/civts.2013.6612283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolving intelligent vehicle control using multi-objective NEAT

Abstract: The research in this paper is inspired by a vision of intelligent vehicles that autonomously move along motorways: they join and leave trains of vehicles (platoons), overtake other vehicles, etc. We propose a multi-objective algorithm based on NEAT and SPEA2 that evolves controllers for such intelligent vehicles. The algorithm yields a set of solutions that embody their own prioritisation of various user requirements such as speed, comfort or fuel economy. This contrasts with most current research into such co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While various implementations of multi-objective NEAT have appeared recently [9,21,13], we believe that our implantation happens to be the only one which does not require the removal of the NEAT speciation (noted as one of the key features of the NEAT algorithm [17]). Instead of removing speciation and replacing it with a different diversity metric, or considering the added diversity inherent in multi-objective search to be sufficient on its own, our implementation performs a Pareto ranking of individuals within each species.…”
Section: Multi-objective Neatmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While various implementations of multi-objective NEAT have appeared recently [9,21,13], we believe that our implantation happens to be the only one which does not require the removal of the NEAT speciation (noted as one of the key features of the NEAT algorithm [17]). Instead of removing speciation and replacing it with a different diversity metric, or considering the added diversity inherent in multi-objective search to be sufficient on its own, our implementation performs a Pareto ranking of individuals within each species.…”
Section: Multi-objective Neatmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The weighted-sum methods cannot, however, determine the weights and the normalization factors that can optimally balance and scale the multiple objective functions for a problem with little or no information [24], which can cause misleading optimization results. 2) Pareto-optimal methods offer a set of Pareto-optimal (or non-dominated) solutions [25], where no single solution is better than another in every criterion [26]. Zhang et al [14] have employed a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA) to reduce the manufacturing cost of the energy storage system and prolong battery life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, a marathon competition has been simulated with the help of MovSim . MovSim has been used for simulation of autonomous vehicle agents enabled with a multiobjective method to find multiple prioritizations for passengers traveling in an autonomous vehicle so that the passenger may chose the way car should be drove . To incorporate human factors in microscopic driver models, a model of personality profile has been incorporated in existing microscopic models, and simulation‐based experiments have been performed using MovSim …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%