2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.01.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolving machine learning models to predict hydrogen sulfide solubility in the presence of various ionic liquids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These models include predictive quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models, molecular docking, structure–activity relationship (SAR) systems, read‐across models, physiology‐based pharmacokinetic models, and quantitative toxicity–toxicity relationship (QTTR) models . In addition to toxicity predictions, these models have been successful in forecasting various physicochemical properties of ILs, such as melting points, surface tensions, infinite dilution activity coefficients, viscosities, conductivities, solubilities, glass transition temperatures, and decomposition temperatures …”
Section: Computational Prediction Of the Toxicity Of Ionic Liquidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These models include predictive quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models, molecular docking, structure–activity relationship (SAR) systems, read‐across models, physiology‐based pharmacokinetic models, and quantitative toxicity–toxicity relationship (QTTR) models . In addition to toxicity predictions, these models have been successful in forecasting various physicochemical properties of ILs, such as melting points, surface tensions, infinite dilution activity coefficients, viscosities, conductivities, solubilities, glass transition temperatures, and decomposition temperatures …”
Section: Computational Prediction Of the Toxicity Of Ionic Liquidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models include predictive quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models, [42][43][44][45] molecular docking, [46] structure-activity relationship (SAR) systems, [47] read-across models, [48][49][50] physiology-based pharmacokinetic models, [51,52] and quantitative toxicity-toxicity relationship (QTTR) models. [53] In addition to toxicity predictions, these models have been successful in forecasting various physicochemical properties of ILs, such as melting points, [54,55] surface tensions, [56,57] infinite dilution activity coefficients, [58][59][60] viscosities, [61,62] conductivities, [63,64] solubilities, [65,66] glass transition temperatures, [64] and decomposition temperatures. [67] Determining the relationship between toxicity and structural features is one of the most basic processes of a model and this is made possible through computational chemistry.…”
Section: Computational Prediction Of the Toxicity Of Ionic Liquidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent applications of machine learning in thermodynamics include solubility or phase equilibria , thermal ( pvT ) properties , , caloric properties , , transport properties , , and surface tension , to cite only a few. A substantial part of the recent work is dedicated to properties of ionic liquids , , , , , that are hard to describe otherwise. Machine learning has also been used for describing the properties of crude oil, asphaltene, and natural gas , , , , , , , .…”
Section: A Preliminary Look Into Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, intelligence schemes have widely applied in different fields in order to modeling nonlinear relationships between concerned variables (Shafiei et al, 2014;Ahmadi and Baghban, 2015;Baghban et al, 2015a;Baghban et al, 2015b;Amedi et al, 2016;Baghban et al, 2016;Bahadori et al, 2016). Artificial neural network, fuzzy logic system, adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system, and support vector machine are for popular and widely used embranchments of intelligence schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%