Evolving patterns of internal security cooperation: lessons from the Schengen and Prüm laboratories

Gaisbauer, Helmut P.

doi:10.1080/09662839.2012.727183

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are also reasons to be cautious about adapting insights from the European experience and applying them to North America. The two main differences are structural-i.e., the asymmetry of power is much more pronounced in North America-and institutional-i.e., Europe has built up a latticework of supranational institutions to manage policy coordination, and North America has very deliberately 12 Egeberg and Trondal [16], Den Boer [12], Gaisbauer [18], Occhipinti [32], and VanNijnatten and Craik [37]. 13 Eberlein and Newman [15], Egeberg and Trondal [16], Slaughter and Hale [36], Bach and Newman [6], Levi-Faur [29], Blauberger and Rittberger [7], and Newman and Zaring [31].…”

Section: Contexts and Comparisonsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…avoided formal institution building. 18 The existence of supranational agencies in Europe, and the option to create more of them, does not necessarily prevent or overwrite TGN-driven coordination there, but it does complicate the picture. EU agencies may actively constrain or suppress networks, formally create and direct them, or coexist in symbiotic partnership with them.…”

Section: Contexts and Comparisonsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Transgovernmental networks and security policy coordination in North America and the European Union: A framework for transatlantic comparative research

Bow

Zaiotti

2020

J Transatl Stud

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article outlines a new research agenda for the study of security policy coordination in Europe and North America. Despite the pressure to build coherent regional and transatlantic architectures to face common security challenges, since 9/11 the two regions have witnessed the coalescence of untidy bricolages of policy-coordination mechanisms-regional, sub-regional, and inter-regional; formal and informal; overarching and issue-specific; functional and dysfunctional. These dynamics raise relevant questions about how best to characterize, explain, and evaluate these network-driven types of policy coordination. Building on the literature on transgovernmental networks (TGNs), this article seeks to address these questions by proposing a comparative and cross-issue analytical framework that seeks to capture the particular forms and functions of existing security policy coordination initiatives across the Atlantic.

show abstract

Section: Contexts and Comparisonsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Contexts and Comparisonsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transgovernmental networks and security policy coordination in North America and the European Union: A framework for transatlantic comparative research

Bow

Zaiotti

2020

J Transatl Stud

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This relates to the theory of clubs (Buchanan 1965), which is intimately connected to public good theory. As is more extensively discussed by Gaisbauer (2013), this approach has particular relevance to the study of EU internal security, which, from its inception, has been characterised by both optouts and intensified cooperation among a limited subset of member states.…”

Section: Explaining Patterns Of Cooperationmentioning

confidence: 99%

European internal security as a public good

Bossong¹,

Rhinard²

2017

Explaining EU Internal Security Cooperation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.

show abstract

“…European Parliament 1982e, 1; European Parliament 1986h, 37. 87 European Political Cooperation 1986a The Treaty of Maastricht was signed on 7 February 1992 and entered into force on 1 November 1993.89 Bossong 2013, 29.90 Monar 2001, 748;Gaisbauer 2013; For a critical assessment of the laboratory metaphor in the context of European integration and cooperation, seeZaiotti 2008. provided 92 However, such arrangements of formality/informality, public/secret and inside/outside produced their own problems and consequences, as is discussed later on.The Europeanization of internal security cooperation did not start with Trevi and it is worthwhile to briefly situate earlier forms of collaboration among police forces and the security and intelligence services, some of which still exist.93 As far back as the mid-nineteenth century, police forces in seven German states began exchanging information in order to get a grip on what they perceived as one of the most dangerous phenomena of the day, political factions across European states working together to spread the revolutionary ideology of liberal democracy.94 In 1898, no less than 21 European states met in Rome to discuss what to do about anarchist violence. They set up channels for the exchange of information and shared knowledge about techniques of identifying wanted criminals.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Ordering terror, terrorizing order

Wittendorp¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverneamendment. Security and securitization3.4.1 A brief genealogy: security as a situated and contingent practice 3.4.2 Critical security studies: discourse and emancipation 3.4.3 Conceptualizing danger and countermeasures 3.5 Methodology and method 3.5.1 Research design 3.5.2 Sources 3.5.3 Methodological principles 3.6 Conclusion Chapter 4 Unpacking international terrorism: the European Community's emergent stake in tackling terrorism, 1972-1986 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Locating a new form of violence 4.2.1 From acts of discovery to acts of appropriation 4.2.2 Violence, authority, morality and the spectre of systemic collapse 4.2.3 International terrorism, borders and modernity 4.3 Knowing across borders: Trevi and the exchange of information 4.3.1 Situating Trevi 4.3.2 Conflicting knowledges in governing counterterrorism cooperation 4.3.3 Beyond intergovernmental counterterrorism cooperation 4.4 Legal initiatives concerning extradition 4.4.1 Extradition and the political offence exemption 4.4.2 Securing the rule of law internationally amidst concerns over sovereignty 4.4.3 Competing visions of harm and response 4.5 Foreign policy and the disciplining of state sponsors of terrorism 4.5.1 Prompting European Political Cooperation in a counterterrorism role 4.5.2 The naming and shaming of Libya and Syria 4.5.3 A selective practice: the use of the state sponsorship label 4.6 Conclusion Chapter 5 Strategizing counterterrorism: from ad hoc to continuous and prudential government, the 1990s and 2001-2015 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Making sense of the 11 September 2001 attacks 5.2.1 Discursive precedents: the EU's terrorism discourse during the 1990s 5.2.2 Forging a transatlantic community of grief: condemnations of the

show abstract

Evolving patterns of internal security cooperation: lessons from the Schengen and Prüm laboratories

Cited by 7 publications

References 14 publications

Transgovernmental networks and security policy coordination in North America and the European Union: A framework for transatlantic comparative research

Transgovernmental networks and security policy coordination in North America and the European Union: A framework for transatlantic comparative research

European internal security as a public good

Ordering terror, terrorizing order

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About