1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(19970415)18:5<660::aid-jcc7>3.0.co;2-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ewald summation versus direct summation of shifted-force potentials for the calculation of electrostatic interactions in solids: A quantitative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electrostatic interactions were computed using the direct summation over the whole domain with no truncation for the Coulomb interactions [30,31].…”
Section: Nemd Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrostatic interactions were computed using the direct summation over the whole domain with no truncation for the Coulomb interactions [30,31].…”
Section: Nemd Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value has been optimised with the final set of site charges (see below) by minimising the difference between the truncated and the true Madelung forces to below 2%. 23 The simulation boxes contained 4 Â 4 Â 5 units cells (3260 atoms) for fluorapatite 7 and 2 Â 4 Â 5 unit cells (3520 atoms) for hydroxyapatite. 8 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most significant ''unresolved'' issues in atomistic simulations is the proper representation of an infinite system, which is critical for the proper treatment of long-range electrostatic effects. Periodic boundary conditions, although appropriate in nonpolar systems for nonelectrostatic problems or in molecular crystals [26], cannot produce truly infinite noncrystalline systems without artifacts when long-range electrostatic interactions are significant. It is only now becoming commonly appreciated that the Ewald method for periodic boundary conditions gives divergent solvation energies for the same solute depending on the size of the simulated system [27].…”
Section: All-atom Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%