1979
DOI: 10.2172/6268967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ex-reactor determination of thermal gap and contact conductance between uranium dioxide: zircaloy-4 interfaces. Stage I: low gas pressure. [PWR; BWR]

Abstract: This report was prepared u an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontracton, or their employees, makes any warrant)', express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefuln~s of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately own… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expression [Eq 2.9.1] predicts a 4-fold improvement in gap conductance while the experimental data obtains 40-fold gap conductance improvement compared to the no-JOG case. This trend is consistent with the conclusion from the experimental research [Garnier 1979] that the expression usually underestimate the actual gap conductance. First, the JOG fully filling the gap is an ideal situation, so the deviation between the expression and the experimental data usually is much smaller since the JOG formation does not cover the entire gap.…”
Section: Anl/nse-19/30supporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The expression [Eq 2.9.1] predicts a 4-fold improvement in gap conductance while the experimental data obtains 40-fold gap conductance improvement compared to the no-JOG case. This trend is consistent with the conclusion from the experimental research [Garnier 1979] that the expression usually underestimate the actual gap conductance. First, the JOG fully filling the gap is an ideal situation, so the deviation between the expression and the experimental data usually is much smaller since the JOG formation does not cover the entire gap.…”
Section: Anl/nse-19/30supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The second database is from an experimental study of thermal gap and contact conductance between depleted uranium dioxide (UO2) and Zircaloy-4 (Zr4) [Garnier 1979]. The experimental data shows that analytical expressions for ideal gap conductance (such as Eq.…”
Section: Anl/nse-19/30mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…noted that considerable scatter existed in contact conductance data available at that time, with the available data taken under widely varying surface and ambient conditions. Therefore, NRC initiated a program to make ex-reactor controlled measurements of gap conductance, including contact conductance; Garnier and Begej (1979) reported their findings from this program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Song et al 5 present a review of various gap-conductancemodels, as summarized in Table 1 where b t is given in terms of the centerline average surface roughness (CLA) (see Refs. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Note that only the Yovanovich integral gap-conductance(YIGC) model (see Ref.…”
Section: Fluidic Materials Gaseous Thermal Interface Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%