2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ex vivo estimation of cementless femoral stem stability using an instrumented hammer

Abstract: Background The success of cementless hip arthroplasty depends on the primary stability of the femoral stem. It remains difficult to assess the optimal number of impacts to guarantee the femoral stem stability while avoiding bone fracture. The aim of this study is to validate a method using a hammer instrumented with a force sensor to monitor the insertion of femoral stem in bovine femoral samples. Methods Different cementless femoral stem were impacted into five bovine femur samples, leading to 99 configuratio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease of pre-stressed state of the bone-implant system due to the fracture 19,37 leads to a decrease of the system rigidity, 4,17,18 which is responsible for a substantial change of the system vibro-acoustic response. In particular, the shift of the FRF to lower frequencies is consistent with a loss of rigidity of the system 24,26,38 due to the periprosthetic bone fracture. However, the change of press-fit due to the fracture should be high enough in order to be detected on the FRF’s measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The decrease of pre-stressed state of the bone-implant system due to the fracture 19,37 leads to a decrease of the system rigidity, 4,17,18 which is responsible for a substantial change of the system vibro-acoustic response. In particular, the shift of the FRF to lower frequencies is consistent with a loss of rigidity of the system 24,26,38 due to the periprosthetic bone fracture. However, the change of press-fit due to the fracture should be high enough in order to be detected on the FRF’s measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…3,[19][20][21] Quantitative methods have widely been studied in the literature for FS insertion monitoring into the host bone. Most of them are based on impact force analysis, [22][23][24] vibration analysis, [25][26][27][28][29] or acoustics measurements. [30][31][32][33] Among these studies aiming at assessing the insertion of the FS, a limited number has been tested to detect periprosthetic fractures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might affect the forces and will be investigated in further studies. The analysis of the stroke dynamics similar to [ 44 , 45 ] might increase the understanding of the impaction process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%