1994
DOI: 10.1137/s0036139993250579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact and Asymptotic Solutions for the Time-Dependent Problem of Collective Ruin I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…λ/(µp). More generally, it was shown by Asmussen (1984), Knessl and Peters (1994) (with p = 1) and Pervozvansky (1998) that the finite time ruin probability ψ(x, t) is given by…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…λ/(µp). More generally, it was shown by Asmussen (1984), Knessl and Peters (1994) (with p = 1) and Pervozvansky (1998) that the finite time ruin probability ψ(x, t) is given by…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…λ/(µp). More generally, it was shown by Asmussen (1984), Knessl and Peters (1994) (with p = 1) and Pervozvansky (1998) that the finite time ruin probability ψ(x, t) is given by ψ(x, t) = 1 − ψ(x, t) = [1 − Ce −γx ]1 (γ>0) + w(x, t), (62) where w(x, t) = 1 π λ µp…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using (2.5), in [36] the Laplace transform of the survival probability φ(t, y) = 1−ψ(t, y) is found when σ P = σ R = 0 and claims are exponentially distributed. However, this transform involves a ratio of confluent hypergeometric functions, and is therefore difficult to invert, the exception is when λ = r in which case the solution is rather simple.…”
Section: Analytical and Numerical Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the finite time horizon case analytical solutions are hard to come by. Using (2.5), in [36] the Laplace transform of the survival probability φ(t, y) = 1−ψ(t, y) is found when σ P = σ R = 0 and claims are exponentially distributed. However, this transform involves a ratio of confluent hypergeometric functions, and is therefore difficult to invert, the exception is when λ = r in which case the solution is rather simple.…”
Section: Analytical and Numerical Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%