2017
DOI: 10.1145/3093333.3009852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact Bayesian inference by symbolic disintegration

Abstract: Bayesian inference, of posterior knowledge from prior knowledge and observed evidence, is typically defined by Bayes's rule, which says the posterior multiplied by the probability of an observation equals a joint probability. But the observation of a continuous quantity usually has probability zero, in which case Bayes's rule says only that the unknown times zero is zero. To infer a posterior distribution from a zero-probability observation, the statistical notion of disintegration tells us to specify the obse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, a method node in a pipeline can be related to a monad aggregating several distributions into a single output distribution (Ścibior et al, 2015). An important challenge in PP is the automation of computing conditional distributions (Shan and Ramsey, 2017). Numerical disintegration and extensions thereof might be of independent interest to this field (e.g.…”
Section: Consistent Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a method node in a pipeline can be related to a monad aggregating several distributions into a single output distribution (Ścibior et al, 2015). An important challenge in PP is the automation of computing conditional distributions (Shan and Ramsey, 2017). Numerical disintegration and extensions thereof might be of independent interest to this field (e.g.…”
Section: Consistent Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, disintegration and Bayesian inversion are used to structurally organise state updates in the presence of new evidence in probabilistic programming; see e.g., Borgström et al (2013), Gordon et al (2014), Katoen et al (2015) and Staton et al (2016). See also Shan and Ramsey (2017), where disintegration is handled via symbolic manipulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Narayanan et al [47] and Zinkov and Shan [63] validated the soundness of program transformations in Hakaru, which contains a programmable MH algorithm. The development of Hakaru is not centered around sample traces, and it uses symbolic disintegration [15,54] to calculate the marginal densities for computing the acceptance ratio in an MH step. In this paper, we focus on a trace-based scheme for programmable inference.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%