1995
DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(94)00563-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact cancellation of quadratic divergences in top condensation models

Abstract: We discuss the hierarchy problem and the corresponding quadratic divergences in the top mode Standard Model. Quadratic divergences appear at each order 1/N c since fermionic and bosonic contributions are of different order 1/N c . It is shown that the full dynamical system to all orders in 1/N c admits a solution, where the sum of all quadratic divergent contributions disappears. *

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the Eqs. ( 10) and ( 11) do not depend on the choice of a gauge parameter and the cancellation of the quadratic divergences in the tadpole graphs ( [29]) does not give the additional independent conditions [30]. We include only the dominate top and bottom quarks contributions (m D → m b , m U → m t ).…”
Section: Cancellation Of the Quadratic Divergencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the Eqs. ( 10) and ( 11) do not depend on the choice of a gauge parameter and the cancellation of the quadratic divergences in the tadpole graphs ( [29]) does not give the additional independent conditions [30]. We include only the dominate top and bottom quarks contributions (m D → m b , m U → m t ).…”
Section: Cancellation Of the Quadratic Divergencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [14] dealt mainly with the question of renormalizability of the model, i.e., of the viability of the limit Λ → ∞. The related question of whether the quadratic divergences cancel exactly in the TSM has recently been investigated [15], with a goal of selecting Λ ≫ O(TeV).…”
Section: Mass Renormalization Corrections and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%