2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2016.04.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact imposition of inhomogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions based on weighted finite cell method and level-set function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where b i ðxÞ denotes the ith weighting coefficient associated with A −1 g i in which basic properties of b i ðxÞ are as follows [23]. b i = δ ij , i, j = 1, 2 ⋯ N, with δ ij denoting the Kronecker delta function.…”
Section: Ab Boundary Conditions With Resolution Adaptedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where b i ðxÞ denotes the ith weighting coefficient associated with A −1 g i in which basic properties of b i ðxÞ are as follows [23]. b i = δ ij , i, j = 1, 2 ⋯ N, with δ ij denoting the Kronecker delta function.…”
Section: Ab Boundary Conditions With Resolution Adaptedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to this feature, a smoothly constructed u a that satisfies the inhomogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions without being approximated on the grid leads to a more accurate solution. For example, the transfinite interpolation technique [16] has been used to construct the required boundary value function in the finite cell method.…”
Section: Implicit Boundary Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed results with several different choices of interpolation spaces in the Lagrange multiplier method and several different penalty values in penalty and Nitsche's methods. Zhang et al [16] summarised energy functionals, interpolation forms and linear systems for different kinds of implicit boundary methods in a brief survey, besides the three methods mentioned above. Ramos et al [6] surveyed different variants of the original Lagrange multiplier method which aim to overcome the stabilisation problem to be discussed later.…”
Section: Weak Imposition Of Dirichlet Boundary Conditions and Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main contribution of this work is equally applicable to standard FEs and the MPM. The IB approach is conceptually similar to the earlier work of Höllig and coworkers in that they both directly modify interpolation functions to impose the essential boundary conditions . The weighted extended B‐spline method of Höllig uses an R‐function to weight the interpolation functions to impose homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a clear distinction between the work of Höllig and coworkers and the IB method is that the latter allows inhomogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions to be imposed independent of the discretisation. The very recent work of Zhang and Zhao provides an extension to the IB method through generalising the boundary value function. They combine these advances with the finite cell method, and the level set method to represent the boundaries, to provide a general method for the imposing of inhomogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions in two dimensions for thermo‐elasticity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%