2018
DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v32i1.12202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact MAP-Inference by Confining Combinatorial Search With LP Relaxation

Abstract: We consider the MAP-inference problem for graphical models, which is a valued constraint satisfaction problem defined on real numbers with a natural summation operation. We propose a family of relaxations (different from the famous Sherali-Adams hierarchy), which naturally define lower bounds for its optimum. This family always contains a tight relaxation and we give an algorithm able to find it and therefore, solve the initial non-relaxed NP-hard problem. The relaxations we consider decompose the original pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are plenty of existing approximation algorithms [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], several problems (described below) require finding an optimal solution. Existing exact algorithms [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], on the other hand, either make specific assumptions about the energy function or do not provide polynomial run-time guarantees for the worst case. Assuming the worst-case scenario, the junction (or clique)-tree algorithm [1,35], therefore, remains the most efficient and general solution for exact MAP inference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are plenty of existing approximation algorithms [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], several problems (described below) require finding an optimal solution. Existing exact algorithms [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], on the other hand, either make specific assumptions about the energy function or do not provide polynomial run-time guarantees for the worst case. Assuming the worst-case scenario, the junction (or clique)-tree algorithm [1,35], therefore, remains the most efficient and general solution for exact MAP inference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exact methods to solve GMs/CFNs mostly rely on Branch-and-Bound (B&B) algorithms [37,20]. These methods have proved useful in many GM applications, such as resource allocation [10], image analysis [23], or computational biology [4,1]. For those, it has been shown to outperform other approaches, including Integer Linear Programming (ILP), MaxSAT and Constraint Programming (CP) [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%