2018
DOI: 10.1364/jocn.10.000209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact Mean Packet Delay for Delayed Report Messages Multipoint Control Protocol in EPON

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MPCP and energy saving issues belong to a transmission convergence layer of EPONs. The article [5] evaluates the exact mean packet delay for the MPCP. The authors proposed a reservation interval allocation method for the REPORTmessage.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MPCP and energy saving issues belong to a transmission convergence layer of EPONs. The article [5] evaluates the exact mean packet delay for the MPCP. The authors proposed a reservation interval allocation method for the REPORTmessage.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 of 5G New Radio (NR) standard by 3GPP, which refers to the exploitation of spectrum bands up to 52.6 GHz, with Rel. 16 including even higher frequencies [2]. Nevertheless, mmWave bands experience high propagation losses, and therefore, enable shorter link ranges than traditional sub-6GHz networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, the gated service scheme addresses this challenge by allocating transmission windows proportional to the number of packets located at the buffer of each user during the reporting phase. This scheme has received great research attention and has been also studied in the context of the Interleaved Polling with Adaptive Cycle Time (IPACT) protocol for Ethernet Passive Optical Networks (EPONs) [15,16]. As shown in [17], gated service IPACT achieves considerable lower delay compared to fixed-service IPACT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, neither of the two protocols accounts for service equalization on a per packet-level, since they target fairness among RRHs (fixed-service) or clients per RRH (Client-Weighted) but without considering the amount of traffic generated by every client within every transmission period. The gated service discipline, i.e., granting transmission windows equal to the number of bytes contained in a user's buffer, effectively addresses the aforementioned problem, and has been extensively studied in the literature, primarily in the context of the Interleaved Polling with Adaptive Cycle Time (IPACT) protocol for Ethernet Passive Optical Networks (EPONs) [15], [16], with delay analysis models confirming superior delay performance compared to fixed-service IPACT [17]. However, to the best of our knowledge, a gated service scheme has never been employed in the context of converged A-RoF FiWi networks, and its delay properties have yet to be studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%