2011
DOI: 10.1017/s000186780000495x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact Monte Carlo simulation for fork-join networks

Abstract: In a fork-join network each incoming job is split into K tasks and the K tasks are simultaneously assigned to K parallel service stations for processing. For the distributions of response times and queue lengths of fork-join networks, no explicit formulae are available. Existing methods provide only analytic approximations for the response time and the queue length distributions. The accuracy of such approximations may be difficult to justify for some complicated fork-join networks. In this paper we propose a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact when c ≥ 3, only bounds and approximations are available. As for exact simulation, there is a paper by Hongsheng Dai [10], in which Poisson arrivals and independent exponential service times are assumed. Because of the continuous-time Markov chain (CTMC) model structure, the author is able to construct (simulate) the time-reversed CTMC to use in a coupling from the past algorithm.…”
Section: Fork-join Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact when c ≥ 3, only bounds and approximations are available. As for exact simulation, there is a paper by Hongsheng Dai [10], in which Poisson arrivals and independent exponential service times are assumed. Because of the continuous-time Markov chain (CTMC) model structure, the author is able to construct (simulate) the time-reversed CTMC to use in a coupling from the past algorithm.…”
Section: Fork-join Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CFTP algorithm is only practical for small discrete sample spaces or for a target distribution having a probability space equipped with a partial order preserved by an appropriate Markov chain construction. Although in recent decades, there have been many theoretical developments and applications in this area 1350-7265 © 2017 ISI/BS such as [4,8,15,16,20,24,28] and [9], the CFTP algorithm is still not practical for complex statistical models.…”
Section: Background Of Exact Monte Carlo Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulate the Brownian bridgeB = {ω t , t ∈ (0, T )} given (ω 0 = x l , ω T = y); 9 Simulate I l = 1 with probability given by (10), with α(x) = ∇A(x) and A(x) = log g l (x); Simulate the Brownian bridgeB = {ω t , t ∈ (0, T )} given (ω 0 = x l , ω T = y); 11 Simulate I l = 1 with probability given by (10), with α(x) = ∇A(x) and A(x) = log g (l) (x); …”
Section: Rejection Sampling For the General Case F = ι L=1 G Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ko and Serfozo [27] studied a single-class multi-server fork-join model with NES as depicted in Figure 1, where the arrival process is Poisson and service times are independent exponential, but their focus is on obtaining approximations for the steadystate system response time. In [10] an exact simulation algorithm is provided for the same Markovian model. Recently, in [8], an exact sampling algorithm is developed to simulate the stationary distribution for a multi-server forkjoin model with NES that has renewal arrivals and i.i.d.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%