2001
DOI: 10.1142/s0217751x01004505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact Renormalization Group Equations and the Field Theoretical Approach to Critical Phenomena

Abstract: After a brief presentation of the exact renormalization group equation, we illustrate how the field theoretical (perturbative) approach to critical phenomena takes place in the more general Wilson (nonperturbative) approach. Notions such as the continuum limit and the renormalizability and the presence of singularities in the perturbative series are discussed.This paper has two parts. In the first part we restrict ourselves to the presentation of some selected issues taken from a recent review on the exact ren… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bagnuls and Bervillier have used the following metaphor: [49,51] the RG trajectories on the critical surface are like rivers in the mountains. In the valley, there is a large river L along which the flow is slow.…”
Section: Renormalizable Couplings and Large River Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bagnuls and Bervillier have used the following metaphor: [49,51] the RG trajectories on the critical surface are like rivers in the mountains. In the valley, there is a large river L along which the flow is slow.…”
Section: Renormalizable Couplings and Large River Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another instance of this was in the loop variable approach[5] where an extra string coordinate was introduced whose zero mode was dual to the scale. The scale also appears as a dimension in[6] in brane engineered QCD.2 Further developments are reviewed in, for instance,[11][12][13][14][15][16] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is tempting to regard our equation (2.5) as a sort of exact renormalization group [13,16,17,18] (see [19,20,21] for a nice review on this subject). However, one must be careful in establishing this relationship, because the RG interpretation of (2.5) is possible only when we make a field-variable transformation at every step such that the kinetic term is kept in the canonical form [see discussions below (3.1)].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%