2015
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2015.2462844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact SMP Algorithms for Integer-Forcing Linear MIMO Receivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where log + 2 (x) = max {log 2 (x), 0}. The first step towards maximizing the rates is to set Plug this into (38) and use Woodbury matrix identity for the inverse of a matrix, we have…”
Section: A If and Sbpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where log + 2 (x) = max {log 2 (x), 0}. The first step towards maximizing the rates is to set Plug this into (38) and use Woodbury matrix identity for the inverse of a matrix, we have…”
Section: A If and Sbpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because this problem is equivalent to finding successive minima of a lattice, we can conveniently employ the sphere decoding algorithms [3], [15] or the LLL algorithms [24], [25]. We can also use the recently proposed algorithms specifically for IF-MIMO [8], [26]- [28].…”
Section: B Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though a brute force for finding the optimal integer matrix A has a high complexity of O(γ M ) [29], some effort has been made to develop more efficient algorithms. For instance, Ding et al [28] developed an optimal algorithm based on SD and Schnorr-Euchner algorithms [17] to find the optimal A with computational complexity of (πe) M +O(log M ) . A similar algorithm with a slightly lower complexity was also proposed in [38].…”
Section: B Decoding Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the symmetricity of rings, the SVP algorithm can have a speed-up. For instance, only 1/4 of the points within a Euclidean ball need to be enumerated in Gaussian integers as |Z [i] × | = 4 (as used in [27]), and only 1/6 of the points need to be enumerated in Eisenstein integers as |Z [ω] × | = 6. Although KZ/Minkowski reduction algorithms do not have the constraint due to Lovasz's condition, their basis expansion process [26] still requires the rings to be Euclidean.…”
Section: Beyond Algebraic Lllmentioning
confidence: 99%