1975
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.12.2447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact solution of a realistic model for two-photon ionization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have chosen He as a target atom for the following reasons: first, its single-electron excitation energies, e.g., 21.218 eV for 1s2p 1 P and 23.087 eV for 1s3p 1 P [20], coincide with the 13th and 15th harmonic photon energies of a Ti:Sapphire laser, respectively, and also with the typical wavelength range of EUV FELs such as the Spring-8 Compact SASE Source (SCSS) [21], the Freeelectron LASer at Hamburg (FLASH) [22], and FERMI [23]. Second, its simple electronic structure allows for exact time-dependent numerical analysis [24][25][26][27][28], in great contrast to alkali atoms.In the case of resonance-enhanced TPI, the resonant ionization path via resonant levels and the nonresonant path via nonresonant intermediate levels coexist [2]. Our results show that in the few fs regime, the competition between the two paths can be controlled by changing the pulse width when the pulse is resonant with a single excited level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…We have chosen He as a target atom for the following reasons: first, its single-electron excitation energies, e.g., 21.218 eV for 1s2p 1 P and 23.087 eV for 1s3p 1 P [20], coincide with the 13th and 15th harmonic photon energies of a Ti:Sapphire laser, respectively, and also with the typical wavelength range of EUV FELs such as the Spring-8 Compact SASE Source (SCSS) [21], the Freeelectron LASer at Hamburg (FLASH) [22], and FERMI [23]. Second, its simple electronic structure allows for exact time-dependent numerical analysis [24][25][26][27][28], in great contrast to alkali atoms.In the case of resonance-enhanced TPI, the resonant ionization path via resonant levels and the nonresonant path via nonresonant intermediate levels coexist [2]. Our results show that in the few fs regime, the competition between the two paths can be controlled by changing the pulse width when the pulse is resonant with a single excited level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In the case of resonance-enhanced 2PI, the resonant ionization path via resonant levels and the nonresonant path via nonresonant intermediate levels coexist [2]. We have shown [44] that a feature peculiar to the few fs regime is the competition between the two paths, leading to a relative phase δ between s and d that is distinct from the value expected from the corresponding scattering phase shifts, which is otherwise intrinsic to the target atom or molecule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Although a rectangular pulse is often assumed in previous work [2] and textbooks, we take, as a more realistic choice, a Gaussian profile f (t) = E 0 e −t 2 /2T 2 , with E 0 and T being the field amplitude and the pulse width, respectively. More precisely, T is related to the full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) pulse width T 1/2 as T 1/2 = 2 √ ln 2 T .…”
Section: Time-dependent Perturbation Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Owing to a breakdown of the perturbation theory of transitions due to an electromagnetic field when intermediate resonances with bound states occur, theoretical studies of resonant multiphoton ionisation (RMPI) generally rely on the notion that this phenomenon can be looked upon as the decay of a nonstationary state with a complex quasi-energy, engendered by a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, which is either phenomenological (Beers and Armstrong 1975;Holt et ale 1983) or constructed more formally (Faisal and Moloney 1981;Maquet et ale 1983). Inherent in these formulations, as well as the resolvent operator formalism (Gontier and Trahin 1979;Faisal 1987), is the assumption that the interaction is turned on at time t = 0 and never switched off.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%