1971
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.4.1960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact Solutions of the Kinetic Equations Governing Thermally Stimulated Luminescence and Conductivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this paper confirm, in principle, the presence of previously found [9,11,13] restriction of validity of the QE assumption for crystals with low density of imperfections.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of this paper confirm, in principle, the presence of previously found [9,11,13] restriction of validity of the QE assumption for crystals with low density of imperfections.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Assuming that the recombination centres are initially fully occupied by the holes and their parameters have the limiting values N = 1014 cm -3 and α = 10 -12 cm3 s-1 , one obtains the initial value of free electron lifetime τ0 = 10-2 s. Therefore, the QE approximation is inaccurate for Τ0 > 10 -2 s. On the other hand, Kelly et al [9] connected the QE validity with the density of active traps. They reported that the QE approximation is invalid if Η < 10 15 cm -3 Their results were, however, obtained for the case assuming absence of deep traps (M = 0, i.e.…”
Section: (T) H(t) Dn(t)/dt Dh(t)/dt Dα(t)/dt γ(T) τ(T)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These variabilities are apart from the usual dependence on E (trap depth usually referred to as the activation energy), s (frequency factor), and the heating rate used for recording the curve. These results led Kelly et al [4] to a very pessimistic conclusion. They stated that in the absence of the knowledge of the parameters of the solid it is virtually impossible to interpret the results uniquely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, numerical solutions of the basic kinetic equations describing the TSL and TSC processes showed that the QE approximation can be questioned. Kelly and colleagues [13] compared the results of numerical solutions of the kinetic equations with the ones obtained from the analytical expressions. They found that the QE approximation is not adequate for the low trap density (<10 15 cm -3 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%