1991
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.66.2207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact treatment of Poisson’s equation in solids with space-filling cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…which is not fulfilled in the so-called moon region between the near VP cells, 2,3,9 shown by light (pink) shading in Fig. 1, or, in other words, the complement of the VP and its bounding sphere with radius r BS .…”
Section: A Computationally Efficient and Accurate Poisson Solvermentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…which is not fulfilled in the so-called moon region between the near VP cells, 2,3,9 shown by light (pink) shading in Fig. 1, or, in other words, the complement of the VP and its bounding sphere with radius r BS .…”
Section: A Computationally Efficient and Accurate Poisson Solvermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In general, the present method is at least 10(l int + 1) 2 N VP times faster than any of the existing schemes. 2,3,8 The factor (l int + 1) 2 comes from an additional internal L sum (typically l int max = 6l ext max ), and the factor 10 is from use of isoparametric integration versus shape functions, if used. In particular, l ext ∼ 8-10 will provide ∼10 4 N VP speedup for a system with N VP sublattices.…”
Section: General Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, "exact" linear muffin-tin orbital (EMTO) method 7 uses an approach from Gonis et al 8 to overcome VP integration issues for the Poisson potential, but it is extremely slowly convergent; various KKR-based codes, such as the linear-scaling multiple-scattering (LSMS), 9 utilizes shape-functions to perform VP integrations, which, as we show, is slowly convergent and limited in accuracy; the full-potential linear augmented wave 10 (FLAPW) method avoids VP integrals (via non-overlapping muffin-tins and Fourier methods over entire unit cell), but never determining site-VP-specific properties and requiring a larger number of spherical harmonic basis functions and huge number of plane-waves.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%