1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb02193.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exaggerated epidural blockade?

Abstract: We welcome the opportunity to reply to Drs Magides and Birks letter. We did attempt radiographic studies with the original catheter, but as stated in our report, this was displaced in the subcutaneous tissue and had to be removed. A catheter was resited at the TI,-TI, interspace because of failure to identify the L,-L, interspace.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 0 publications
references
References 7 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance

No citations

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?