1983
DOI: 10.3109/10641968309081811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exaggerated Hypotensive Responses to Calcium Antagonists in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats

Abstract: The hypotensive effects of intravenous injection and infusion of diltiazem, l- and d-verapamil were investigated in conscious and anaesthetized rats with spontaneous hypertension (SHR) and normal blood pressure (NT-WKY). The inhibitory actions of these calcium-influx blockers on the pressor responses to angiotensin II (AII) and noradrenaline (NA) were also examined in anaesthetized SHR and NT-WKY. The intravenous injections of these three drugs (0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0 mg/kg) lowered mean arterial pressure (MAP) i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This concept concurs with reports that CCBs lower blood pressure in SHR but do not significantly affect pressure in WKY rats. [1][2][3] Similarly, nifedipine significantly reduces blood pressure in some humans with essential hypertension but has relatively little effect on blood pressure levels in normotensive individuals. 27 Thus, the upregulation of the ␣ 1C subunit in some forms of hypertension may predispose an individual to the vasodilator effect of CCBs, and similarly, drug sensitivity differences to CCBs between hypertensive individuals may relate to the further modulation of the ␣ 1C gene by other regulatory factors that alter channel expression.…”
Section: Physiological and Therapeutic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This concept concurs with reports that CCBs lower blood pressure in SHR but do not significantly affect pressure in WKY rats. [1][2][3] Similarly, nifedipine significantly reduces blood pressure in some humans with essential hypertension but has relatively little effect on blood pressure levels in normotensive individuals. 27 Thus, the upregulation of the ␣ 1C subunit in some forms of hypertension may predispose an individual to the vasodilator effect of CCBs, and similarly, drug sensitivity differences to CCBs between hypertensive individuals may relate to the further modulation of the ␣ 1C gene by other regulatory factors that alter channel expression.…”
Section: Physiological and Therapeutic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine if these Ca 2ϩ channel abnormalities extended to the SHR skeletal muscle bed, we repeated a similar series of studies in WKY and SHR hind limb arteries. Skeletal muscle arteries from SHR also expressed higher levels of [1][2][3] Similarly, the arterioles of the mesenteric and skeletal muscle beds of SHR develop an abnormal Ca 2ϩ -dependent vascular tone and show increased myogenic responsiveness. 4 -6 Isolated mesenteric and femoral arteries of SHR also develop abnormal Ca 2ϩ -dependent tone, whereas similar arteries from WKY rats are quiescent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fortuitously, the increased abundance of the vascular α 1C subunits during hypertension may provide more binding sites for CCBs, thereby amplifying their vasodilator action proportional to blood pressure elevation. This may help to explain why CCBs effectively lower blood pressure in hypertensive animals and humans, but only mildly reduce blood pressure levels in normotensive individuals (Godfraind et al, 1991;Miyamori et al, 1987;Narita et al, 1983;Takata and Hutchinson, 1983).…”
Section: Implications For Antihypertensive Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is feasible that the results obtained by Marshall et al (1987) were due to the use of hypertensive animals, since it is well known that such animals are more sensitive to acute hypotensive stimuli (Takata & Hutchinson, 1983), possibly due to impaired baroreflexes (Thoren et al, 1979;Verberne et al, 1988; but see also Unger et al, 1987). In addition, impaired baroreflexes might have contributed to a chronic failure of hypertensive rats to counteract the hypotensive effects of human a-CGRP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%