2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.01882.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exam‐indicated cerclage in patients with fetal membranes at or beyond external os: A retrospective evaluation

Abstract: Exam-indicated cerclage appears to prolong gestation compared to expectant management.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
29
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Inclusion criteria for the studies reported in this analysis included women with a gestational age of 14 to 27 weeks (mean of 21.7 wk in cerclage group and 22.8 wk in expectant group) and cervical dilation of 1 to 5 cm (mean of 3.3 cm in cerclage group and 3.5 cm in expectant group). [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] The authors found improved neonatal survival [71% vs. 43%; relative risk (RR) 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-2.28), fewer deliveries before 34 weeks gestation (50% vs. 83%; RR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38-0.80), and a nonsignificant trend toward fewer deliveries before 24 weeks gestation (23% vs. 33%; RR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.14-1.53) among women who underwent emergency cerclage compared with women managed expectantly. Mean gestational age at delivery was 30.6 weeks in the cerclage group compared with 25.2 weeks in the expectantly managed group (RR 4.62; 95% CI, 3.89-5.36) with mean time to delivery of 56.7 and 18.8 days, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inclusion criteria for the studies reported in this analysis included women with a gestational age of 14 to 27 weeks (mean of 21.7 wk in cerclage group and 22.8 wk in expectant group) and cervical dilation of 1 to 5 cm (mean of 3.3 cm in cerclage group and 3.5 cm in expectant group). [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] The authors found improved neonatal survival [71% vs. 43%; relative risk (RR) 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-2.28), fewer deliveries before 34 weeks gestation (50% vs. 83%; RR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38-0.80), and a nonsignificant trend toward fewer deliveries before 24 weeks gestation (23% vs. 33%; RR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.14-1.53) among women who underwent emergency cerclage compared with women managed expectantly. Mean gestational age at delivery was 30.6 weeks in the cerclage group compared with 25.2 weeks in the expectantly managed group (RR 4.62; 95% CI, 3.89-5.36) with mean time to delivery of 56.7 and 18.8 days, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,26 In a retrospective cohort study of 52 women, the mean white blood cell (WBC) count was higher among women who were expectantly managed when compared with those who underwent physical examination-indicated cerclage (14.7 vs. 9.76 k/mL), suggesting provider avoidance of cerclage placement in cases of leukocytosis. 6 Although a strict cut-off for WBC has not yet been identified in prospective studies, leukocytosis in this sitting should give the obstetrician pause and increase suspicion for a subclinical infection. The use of amniocentesis and amniotic markers of infection for patient selection will be reviewed separately.…”
Section: Laboratory Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Os (32) encontraram resultados semelhantes, 28 semanas e 23 semanas, respectivamente. Outros autores (28,(34)(35)(36) descrevem idade gestacional do parto mais elevada, variando entre 29 e 34,8 semanas no grupo cerclagem e 24 e 27,7 semanas no grupo controle. O período de latência médio obtido foi 48,63 dias no grupo cerclagem e 16 dias no grupo repouso.…”
Section: Resultados Gestacionaisunclassified
“…(29,30) . Destes, apenas um foi randomizado (29) , e houve número reduzido de casos ( (30,32,34,36) .…”
Section: Casuística E Métodounclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation